Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T07:30:11.766Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hybrid Proton-Carrier Polymer Composites for High-Temperature FCPEM Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

F. J. Pern
Affiliation:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 1617 Cole Blvd., Golden, CO 80401
J. A. Turner
Affiliation:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 1617 Cole Blvd., Golden, CO 80401
A. M. Herring
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 80401
Get access

Abstract

Hybrid proton-carrier polymer composites were fabricated in an effort to develop high-performance high-temperature proton exchange membranes (PEMs) for fuel cell applications in the 100°–200°C range. The solution-cast hybrid membranes comprise a polymer host and a SiO2-based proton-carrier composite that was synthesized via sol gel approach using a functional silane and tetraethoxysilane (TEOS) in acidic conditions. The primary H+-carrying component was either a heteropoly silicotungstic acid (STA) or a sulfonic acid (SFA) that was thermooxidatively converted from a mercapto (-SH) group. The embedding level of STA on the silane-modified SiO2 sol gel composites was strongly affected by the presence and the functional group of the silane. Ion exchange capacity (IEC) of the water-washed, SiO2-based STA and SFA proton-carrier composite powders is in the range of 1.8–3.5 mmol/g, two to three times higher than that for Nafion 117 (0.9 meq/mol). A glycidylmethacrylate-type copolymer, PEMAGMA, which is stable up to ∼225°C, was able to produce mechanically robust and flexible hybrid membranes. Upon curing, the PEMAGMA composite membranes showed a ∼75% gel under the present formulation and retained the "free" STA effectively with slight loss when extracted in an 85°C water. The W12-STA-containing PEMAGMA membranes followed the weight loss trends of water from STA and the SiO2-based sol gel composite, showing a 10 wt% loss at 150°C and a 15 wt% loss at 225°C. Fuel cell performance tests of the preliminary films gave a Voc in the 0.85–0.93 V range, but a low current density of <4 mA/cm2. The resistive characteristics were attributed to inhomogeneous distribution of the sol gel nanoparticles in the PEMAGMA matrix, a result of phase separation and particulate agglomeration during film forming.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Li, Q., He, R., Jensen, J. O., and Bjerrum, N. J., Chem. Mater., 15, 48964915 (2003).Google Scholar
2. Damay, F. and Klein, L.C., Solid State Ionics, 162–163, 261267 (2003).Google Scholar
3. Kwak, S.-H., Yang, T.-H., Kim, C.-S., and Yoon, K. H., Solid State Ionics, 160, 309315 (2003).Google Scholar
4. Honma, I., Nakajima, H., Nishikawa, O., Sugimoto, T., and Nomura, S., Solid State Ionics, 162–163, 237245 (2003).Google Scholar
5. Staiti, P., Freni, S., and Hocevar, S., J. Power Sources, 79, 250255 (1999).Google Scholar
6. Boysen, D. A., Uda, T., Chisholm, C. R. I., and Haile, S. M., Science, 303, 6870 (2004).Google Scholar
7. Herring, A. M., Dec, S. F., Fanqin Meng, Horan, J., Malers, J. L., Sweikart, M. A., Turner, J. A., and Pern, F. J., “Investigations of Heteropoly Acids for Inorganic Proton Conducting Fuel Cell Membranes”. US DOE Hydrogen, Fuel Cells & Infrastructure Technologies Program 2003 Annual Merit Review Meeting, May 2003, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
8. Meng, F., Dec, S. F., Herring, A. M., and Turner, J. A.; “Heteropoly Acids as Potential Solid Electrolytes in Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Research”, presented at the 14th International Conference on Solid State Ionics – Materials for Energy Conversion and the Environment, June 2003, Monterey, CA.Google Scholar
9. Park, Y. and Nagai, M., Solid State Ionics, 145, 149160 (2001).Google Scholar
10. Suzuki, H., Yoshida, Y., Mehta, M. A., Watanabe, M., and Fujinami, T., Fuel Cells, 2, 46 (2002).Google Scholar