Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

High-Purity Germanium Technology for Gamma-Ray and X-Ray Spectroscopy

  • L.S. Darken (a1) and C. E. Cox (a1)

Abstract

High-purity germanium (HPGe) for gamma-ray spectroscopy is a mature technology that continues to evolve. Detector size is continually increasing, allowing efficient detection of higher energy gamma rays and improving the count rate and minimum detectable activity for lower energy gamma rays. For low-energy X rays, entrance window thicknesses have been reduced to where they are comparable to those in Si(Li) detectors. While some limits to HPGe technology are set by intrinsic properties, the frontiers have historically been determined by the level of control over extrinsic properties. The point defects responsible for hole trapping are considered in terms of the “standard level” model for hole capture. This model originates in the observation that the magnitude and temperature dependence of the cross section for hole capture at many acceptors in germanium is exactly that obtained if all incident s-wave holes were captured. That is, the capture rate is apparently limited by the arrival rate of holes that can make an angular-momentum-conserving transition to a s ground state. This model can also be generalized to other materials, where it may serve as an upper limit for direct capture into the ground state for either electrons or holes. The capture cross section for standard levels σS.L. is given by

where g is the degeneracy of the ground state of the center after capture, divided by the degeneracy before capture. Mc is the number of equivalent extrema in the band structure for the carrier being captured, mo is the electronic mass, m* is the effective mass, and T is the temperature in degrees Kelvin.

Copyright

References

Hide All
1. Teal, G.K. and Little, J.B., Phys. Rev. 78, 647 (1950).
2. Hall, R.N. in Semiconductor Materials for γ-Ray Detectors-Proceedings of the Meeting, W.L. Brown (BTL) and Wagner, S. (BNL) eds. (1966) p. 27.
3. Hall, R.N., IEEE Trans. Nuci. Sci. 21, 260 (1974).
4. Haller, E.E., Hansen, W.L., and Goulding, F.S., Adv. in Phys. 30, 93 (1981).
5. Darken, L.S., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS–26, 324 (1979).
6. Pehl, R.H., Madden, N.W., Elliot, J.H., Raudorf, R.W., Trammell, R.C., and Darken, L.S. Jr., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS–26, 321 (1979).
7. Llacer, J., Haller, E.E., and Cordi, R.C., IEEE Trans. Nuci. Sci. NS–24 (1), 53 (1977).
8. Slapa, M., Chwaszczewska, J., Huth, G.C., and Jurkowski, J., Nucl. Instr. Meth 196, 575 (1982).
9. Barbi, N.C., and Lister, D.B., NBS Special Publication No. 604, 35 (1981).
10. Fink, R.W., NBS Special Publication No. 604, 5 (1981).
11. Steel, E.B., Microbeam Analysis 1986. Proc. 21st Annual Conf. Microbeam Analysis Soc. (1986), p. 439.
12. Zullinger, H.R., and Aitken, D.W., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS–15, 466 (1968).
13. Zullinger, H.R. and Aitken, D.W., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS–16, 47 (1969).
14. Cox, C.E., Lowe, B.G., and Sareen, R.A., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 35 (1), 8 (1988).
15. Baertsch, R.D., IEEE Trans. Nuci. Sci. NS–18, 166 (1971).
16. Pehl, R.M., Cordi, R.C., and Goulding, F.S., IEEE Trans. Nuci. Sci. NS–19, 265 (1972).
17. Maim, H.L., IEEE Trans. Nuci. Sci. NS–22 (1), 140 (1975).
18. Rossington, C.S., Walton, J.T., and Jaklevic, J.M., IEEE Trans. Nuci. Sci. 38, 239 (1991).
19. Rossington, C.S., Giauque, R.D., and Jaldevic, J.M., IEEE Trans. Nuci. Sci. 39, 570 (1992).
20. Nashashibi, T. and White, G., IEEE Trans. Nut. Sci. 37 (2), 452 (1990).
21. Darken, L.S. and Jellison, G.E., (submitted for publication).
22. Darken, L.S., Phys. Rev. Aett. 69, 2839 (1992).
23. Actually, m* = mdC 3/2;/m ½ where mdc is the density of states effective mass and m is the mass required to give the right thermal velocity (3/2 kT = 1/2 m <v>2). Equation (5) also approximates <v>2 = <v2>.4
24. Darken, L.S. Jr., Trammell, R. C., Raudorf, T. W., Pehl, R. H., and Elliot, J.N., Nucl. Instr. Meth 171, 49 (1980).
25. Darken, L.S., Nucl. Instr. Meth Phys. Res. B (accepted for publication, 1993).
26. Darken, L.S., Trammell, R.C., Raudorf, T.W., and Pehl, R.H., IEEE Trans. Nut. Sci. NS–28, 572 (1981).
27. Fourches, N., Walter, G., and Bougoin, J.C., J. Appl. Phys. 69, 2033 (1991).

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed