Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T11:41:53.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Highly-Insulating Ultra-Thin SiO2 Film Grown by VUV Photo-Oxidation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

Atsuyuki Fukano
Affiliation:
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), 1-1-1 Umezono, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8568, Japan
Hiroyuki Oyanagi
Affiliation:
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), 1-1-1 Umezono, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8568, Japan
Get access

Abstract

Insulating performance of high-density SiO2 films on Si(100) wafer grown by VUV irradiation in oxygen atmosphere at low-temperatures (300 ∼ 400°C) is reported. Comparing the SiO2 films grew with various wavelength irradiation, i.e., 126, 172 and 222nm, we found a strong wavelength dependence in density and insulating performance. The results suggest that electrical characteristics are highly correlated with film density. Higher density films are formed by shorter wavelength photo-oxidation whereas higher breakdown voltage and lower leakage current are achieved by the dense films. This shows that lower density of defects, dangling bonds, existing at the Si-O interface strongly affects the insulating performance. VUV photo-oxidation is a promising silicon oxide growth technique with greater insulating performance beyond the conventional limit for thermally oxidized films.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS) 2003 Edition.Google Scholar
2. Fukano, A. and Oyanagi, H. in Structure-Property Relationships of Oxide Surfaces and Interfaces II, edited by Alexander, K.B., Carter, C.B., Grimes, R.W., Pan, X., Wood, T.E., (Mat.Res.Soc.Symp.Proc. 751, Boston, MA, 2003) pp.6166.Google Scholar
3. Fukano, A. and Oyanagi, H., J. Appl.Phys. 94, 3345 (2003).Google Scholar
4. Luo, T.Y., Laughery, M., Brown, G.A., Al-Shareef, H.N., Watt, V.H.C., Karamcheti, A., Jackson, M.D. and Huff, H.R., IEEE Electron Device Lett. 21, 430 (2000).Google Scholar
5. Parratt, L.G., Phys.Rev. 95, 359 (1954).Google Scholar
6. Nagai, N. and Hashimoto, H., Appl.Surf.Sci 172, 307 (2001).Google Scholar
7. Grunthaner, P.J., Hecht, M.H., Grunfhaner, F.J. and Jonson, N.M., J. Appl.Phys. 61, 629 (1987).,Google Scholar
8. Himpsel, F.J., McFeely, F.R., Taleb-Ibrahimi, A. and Yarmoff, J.A., Phys.Rev. B 38, 6084 (1988).Google Scholar
9. Hochella, M.F. Jr., and Carim, A.H., Surf. Sci. 197, L260 (1988)Google Scholar
10. Muraji, Y., Yoshikawa, K., Nakamura, M. and Nakagawa, Y., Jpn.J.Appl.Phys. 41, 805 (2002).Google Scholar
11. McPherson, W.J. and Khamankar, R.B., Semicond.Sci.Technol. 15, 462 (2000).Google Scholar
12. Kaliwoh, N., Zhang, J.Y. and Boyd, I.W., Appl.Surf.Sci. 168, 288 (2000).Google Scholar