Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T11:16:19.702Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Heterostructure Doping by Compact Electron Beam Sources

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

P.P. Chow
Affiliation:
SVT Associates, Eden Prairie, MN
J.Van Hove
Affiliation:
SVT Associates, Eden Prairie, MN
M.F. Rosamond
Affiliation:
SVT Associates, Eden Prairie, MN
G.L. Carpenter
Affiliation:
SVT Associates, Eden Prairie, MN
L.A. Chow
Affiliation:
Stanford University, Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, Palo Alto, CA
Get access

Abstract

Performance of many III-V compound heterostructure devices relies on exact control of dopant placement and concentration. This requires the dopant source to be responsive and reproducible. We report a novel electron beam evaporation source for both carbon and silicon dopant incorporation in MBE growth of III-V compounds. Carbon in particular has attracted much interest as a replacement of beryllium for p-type doping in III-V compounds. Not only high doping levels are achievable, its low diffusion coefficient makes abrupt interface possible even after high temperature processing and operation. This source provides a convenient means for generating high carbon flux. It is equipped with a compact flux monitor such that the dopant levels can be adjusted in real time. The GaAs samples show excellent photoluminescence peaks and mobility results. Good carbon doping for GaSb was reported for the first time.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Chiu, T.H., Cunningham, J.E., Ditzenberger, J.A., Jan, W.Y., and Chu, S.N.G., J.Cryst.Growth 111,274(1991).Google Scholar
2 Ren, F., Gullowan, T.R., Lothian, J., Wisk, P.W., Abernathy, C.R., Kopf, R.F., Emerson, A.B., Downey, S.W., and Pearton, S.J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 59, 3613(1991).Google Scholar
3 Konagai, M., Yamada, T., Akatsuka, T., Nozaki, S., Miyaké, R., Saito, K., Fukamachi, T., Tokumitsu, E., and Takahashi, K., J. Cryst. Growth 105, 359(1990).Google Scholar
4 Cunningham, B.J., Guido, L.J., Baker, J.E., Major, J.S., Jr., Holonyak, N. Jr., and Stillman, G.E., Appl. Phys. Lett. 55, 687(1989).Google Scholar
5 Yu-Min, Houng, Lester, S.D., Mars, D.E., and Miller, J.N., J.Vac. Sci. Technol. Bl 1, 915(1993).Google Scholar
6 Malik, R.J., Nottenberg, R.N., Schubert, E.F., Walker, J.F., and R.W. Ryan, Appl. Phys Lett. 53, 2661(1988).Google Scholar
7 Nagle, J., Malik, R.J., and Gershoni, D., J. Cryst. Growth 111, 254(1991).Google Scholar
8 Hoke, W.E., Lemonias, P.J., Lyman, P. S., Hendriks, H.T., Weir, D., and Colombo, P., J. Cryst. Growth 111, 269(1991).Google Scholar
9 Subbanna, S., Tuttle, G., and Kroemer, K., J. Elect. Mater. 17, 297(1988).Google Scholar
10 Boris Sverdlov, (private communication).Google Scholar
11 Chow, D.H., Miles, R.H., Schulman, J.N., Collins, D.A. and McGill, T.C., Semicond.Sci.Technol. 6,C47–C51(1991)Google Scholar