Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Heteroepitaxy of Ge on Vicinal Si(100)

  • Mohan Krishnamurthy (a1), Jeff S. Drucker (a2) and J.A. Venables (a2) (a3)

Abstract

The initial stages of germanium heteroepitaxy on vicinal Si(100) have been studied using in-situ deposition in a UHV STEM. Germanium was deposited using molecular beam techniques onto substrates misoriented 1° and 5* toward <110> held at room temperature, 375°C and 525°C. Film thicknesses were in the range 4-6 ML, just greater than the stable intermediate layer of 3-4ML (1ML = 0.14nm). The Ge clusters were observed using biassed secondary electron (b-SE) imaging with nanometer resolution. Comparisons were made between deposition at the elevated temperatures, and room temperature deposition followed by anneals at the same temperatures.

Annealing the low temperature deposits produces coarsening of the islands which is similar on the 1° and 5° samples. Island size distributions and other film growth parameters obtained from the 375°C and 525°C anneals indicate that the coarsening is different at these temperatures and is possibly affected by instabilities in the intermediate layer. Results of the high temperature depositions indicate that neither surface steps nor the edges of islands act as perfect sinks, and that diffusion distances are of the order of several microns. The nucleation density and size distributions are markedly different for deposition at 375°C and 525°C possibly due to competitive capture at strong sinks.

In a parallel set of experiments in a standard UHV chamber, macroscopic wafer samples were analyzed with RHEED, Auger and secondary electron spectroscopy. These correlate well with the intermediate layer thicknesses previously reported in the literature, and the large contrast observed in the b-SE images. Ex situ TEM studies of samples grown in this chamber show islands with various contrast features including those of coherent strain.

Copyright

References

Hide All
[1] Bean, J. C., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 4, 1427(1986).
[2] Pearsall, Thomas P., CRC Critical Reviews in Solid state and Materials Sciences 15, 551(1989) and references quoted.
[3] Eaglesham, D. J. and Cerullo, M., Bull. Am. Phys. Soc 35, 328 (1990)
[4] Venables, J. A., Phys. Rev. B 36, 4153 (1987).
[5] Venables, J.A., Doust, T. and Kariotis, R., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 94, 3 (1987); T. Doust, F. L. Metcalfe and J. A. Venables, Ultramicroscopy 31,116 (1989)
[6] Zinke-Allmang, M., Feldman, L. C., Nakahara, S. and Davidson, R. A., Phys. Rev. B 39, 7848(1989)
[7] Drucker, J.S., Krishnamurthy, M., Hong, Luo Chuan, Hembree, G.G. and Venables, J.A., Proc. Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. 98 (EMAG '89), 303 (1989).
[8] Virginia Semiconductor Inc.
[9] Swartzenruber, B. S., Mo, Y.-W., Webb, M. B. and Lagally, M. G., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 7, 2901 (1989).
[10] Semper 6 plus Synoptics.
[11] Gossman, H. J. and Fisanick, G. J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol A 6, 2037 (1988).
[12] Lagally, M. G. and Mo, Y. W., Bull. Am. Phys. Soc 35, 310 (1990).

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed