Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-sv6ng Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T11:18:35.039Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hard Tissue Regeneration In Strombus Gigas, the Giant Queen Conch

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

X. Su
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering Case Western Reserve University 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106–7204
A. H. Heuer
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering Case Western Reserve University 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106–7204
Get access

Abstract

Hard tissue regeneration (i.e. shell repair) is an important biomineralization process in mollusks. Rapid regeneration is important in avoiding loss of fluids and preventing attacks by predators. We have studied such tissue regeneration in the Queen conch (Strombus Gigas) by inserting an abiotic glass cover slide between the mantle tissue and the shell. The glass cover slides were removed after mineralization periods extending from 6 hours to 4 days, and the deposited materials on the glass substrates (“flat pearls”) analyzed by X-ray diffraction, and scanning and transmission electron microscopy.

Although the CaCO3 in native Queen conch shell is exclusively aragonite, calcite was detected in the regenerated materials grown on glass substrates. Calcite formation occurred only during the very early stage of mineralization and the initial minerals formed were soon overgrown by aragonite. The initial aragonite overgrowth had a spherulitic morphology, and was thus relatively poorly oriented; after this spherulitic transient, the microstructure was recognizable as the crossed-lamellar structure of the natural shell.

Thus, shell regeneration on abiotic substrates differs from shell formation during growth of conchs only in the very early stage. Once the crossed-lamellar microstructure has formed, further hard tissue development is identical to that occurring during natural shell growth.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Gregoire, C., in Chemical Zoology, edited by Florkin, M., Scheer, B. T. (Academic Press, New York and London, 1972), p. 45.Google Scholar
2. Lowenstam, H. A. and Weiner, S., On Biomineralization, (Oxford University Press, New York, 1989).Google Scholar
3. Jackson, A. P., Vincent, J. F. V., and Turner, R. M., Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B234, 415 (1988).Google Scholar
4. Jackson, A. P., Vincent, J. F. V., and Turner, R. M., J. Mater. Sci. 25, 3,173 (1990).Google Scholar
5. L. T. Kuhn-Spearing, Kessler, H., Chateau, E., Ballarini, R., Heuer, A. H. and Spearing, S. M., J. Mater. Sci. 31, 6,583 (1996).Google Scholar
6. Laraia, V. J., Aindow, M., and Heuer, A. H., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 174, 117 (1990).Google Scholar
7. Belcher, A. M., Wu, X. H., Christensen, R. J., Hansma, P. K., Stucky, G. D., Morse, D. E., Nature 381, 56 (1996).Google Scholar
8. Nakahara, H., Kakei, M., and Bevelander, G., The Veliger, 23, 207 (1981).Google Scholar
9. Vermeil, G. J., in Skeletal Growth of Aquatic Organisms, edited by Rhoads, D. C. and Lutz, R. A. (Plenum Press, New York, 1980), p. 379.Google Scholar
10. Watabe, N., in Mollusca, edited by Saleuddin, A. S. M. and Wilbur, K. M. (Academic Press, New York, 1983), p. 289.Google Scholar
11. Wilbur, K. M. and Watabe, N., N. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 109, 82 (1963).Google Scholar
12. Falini, G., Albeck, S., Weiner, S., and Addadi, L., Science 271, 67 (1996).Google Scholar
13. Zaremba, C. M., Belcher, A. M., Fritz, M., Li, Y., Mann, S., Hansma, P. K., Morse, D. E., Speck, J. S., and Stucky, G. D., Chem. Mater. 8, 679 (1996).Google Scholar
14. Abolins-Krogis, A., Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 22, 75 (1968).Google Scholar