Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T04:12:29.269Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Geological Characteristics of “Mayak” Enterprise Area Regarding Underground Nuclear Waste Disposal and Rehabilitation of Territory (Southern Urals, Russia)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

V. I. Velichkin
Affiliation:
Department of Rare Metals Geology and Radiogeoecology, IGEM, Russian Academy of Sciences, Staromonetny per.35, 109017, Moscow, Russia.
N. N. Tarasov
Affiliation:
Department of Rare Metals Geology and Radiogeoecology, IGEM, Russian Academy of Sciences, Staromonetny per.35, 109017, Moscow, Russia.
V. V. Poluektov
Affiliation:
Department of Rare Metals Geology and Radiogeoecology, IGEM, Russian Academy of Sciences, Staromonetny per.35, 109017, Moscow, Russia.
A. A. Asadulin
Affiliation:
Department of Rare Metals Geology and Radiogeoecology, IGEM, Russian Academy of Sciences, Staromonetny per.35, 109017, Moscow, Russia.
Get access

Abstract

The geological investigations necessary for the HLW underground disposal site selection were udertaken on the contaminated territory mostly covered by vegetation and water-bodies. For lack of availiable outcrops, special attention was given to detailed petrological and geochemical studies for more reliable extrapolations. As a result, models of structure, geochemical background, and rock basement origin scenario provided general criteria for selection of geological blocks suitable for HLW deep burial.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Drozhko, E.G., Sharalapov, V.I., Posokhov, A.K., e.a., History, contamination and monitoring of water bodies at the p/a “Mayak”, in 1993 International Conference on Nuclear Waste Management and Environmental Remediation (Amer. Soc. Mech. Eng., NY, 1993), v.2, pp. 159163.Google Scholar
2. Plyusnin, L.P., Metodika Izucheniya Tectonicheskikh Structur Skladchatykh Poyasov, (Perm’,1971) p. 217.Google Scholar
3. Bogatikov, O.A., Gon’shakova, V.I., Efremova, S.V., e.a., Klassifikatsiya i Nomenklatura Magmaticheskikh Gornykh Porod (Nedra, Moscow, 1981), p. 160.Google Scholar
4. Omel’yanenko, B.I., Zaraisky, G.P., Starostin, V.I., e.a., The petrographic criteria of selection of geological environments for building high-level waste (HLW) repository, in 1993 International Conference on Nuclear Waste Management and Environmental Remediation (Amer. Soc. Mech. Eng., NY, 1993), v.1, pp. 697702.Google Scholar
5. Starostin, V.I., Petrov, V.A., Velichkin, V.I., Structural-Petrophysical and Geodynamical Criteria for Selection of Crystalline rocks massifs in connection with the Problems of Burial of Radioactive Wastes (in print).Google Scholar
6. Pearce, J.A. and Cann, J.R., Tectonic setting of basic volcanic rocks determined using trace element analyses, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 19, (1973), 290.Google Scholar
7. Rare Earth Element Geochemistry, edited by Henderson, P. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1985), p. 510.Google Scholar
8. Wood, D.A., The application of a Th-Hf-Ta diagram to problems of tectonomagmatic classification and to establishing the nature of crustal contamination of basaltic lavas of the British Tertiary volcanic province, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 50, (1980) 1130.Google Scholar
9. Gill, J.B., Orogenic Andesites and Plate Tectonics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1981) p.89.Google Scholar
10. Geochemical plots were created with the aid of NewPet (C) 1987–1993 software: Daryl Clarke, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Department of Earth Sciences, Centre for Earth Resources Recearch, NF, Canada.Google Scholar