Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-13T07:58:09.236Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Gadolinium Solubility Limits in Sodium-Aluminoborosilicate Glasses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

L. Li
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, Liyu.Li@pni.gov
D. M. Strachan
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, Liyu.Li@pni.gov
L. L. Davis
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, Liyu.Li@pni.gov
H. Li
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, Liyu.Li@pni.gov
M. Qian
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, Liyu.Li@pni.gov
Get access

Abstract

Gadolinium and lanthanum solubility limits in a sodium-alumino-borosilicate glass system were studied. As melting temperature increased from 1400°C to 1450°C, 1500°C and 1550°C, the solubility of gadolinium in the baseline glass 15B2O3-5A12O3-20Na2O-60SiO2 (in molar composition) increased from 10.1 to 11.3, 12.2 and 13.1 (in mole percent of Gd2O3). The enthalpy change of Gd2O3 dissolution in this baseline glass is about 43.6 kJ/mol. Boron effect on lanthanum solubility was studied using the following baseline glasses: xB2O3-20Na2O- 5Al2O3-60SiO2, where x equals to 5, 10, 15, and 20, respectively. It was found that lanthanum solubility limit increased from 8.4 to 10.3, 12.5 and 14.9 (in mole percent of La2O3) as B2O3 increased from 5.1 to 9.5, 13.1 and 16.2 mol%. Gd2O. and La2O3 have similar solubility limits. Solubility limits of mixtures containing different ratios of Gd2O3 to La2O3 in the baseline glass 15B2O3-20Na2O-5A12O3-60SiO2 were found insensitive to the ratio of La/Gd. As far as gadolinium is concerned, its solubility limit will decrease when other lanthanides are introduced.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Record of Decision for the Storage and Disposition of Weapons-Usable Fissile Materials.: Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement, U.S. Department of Energy, January 14, 1997.Google Scholar
2. Technical Summary Report for Surplus Weapons-Usable Plutonium Disposition, Report DOE/MD-0003, Office of Fissile Materials Disposition, U.S. Department of Energy, July 17, 1996.Google Scholar
3. Gray, L.W. and Gould, T.H., Immobilization Technology Down-Selection Radiation Barrier Approach, Report UCRL-ID-127320, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, 1997.Google Scholar
4. Meaker, T.F., Peeler, D.K., Marra, J.C., Pareizs, J.M., Ramsey, W.G., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XX, edited by Gray, W.J., and Triay, I.R. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 465, Pittsburgh, PA, 1997) pp. 12811286.Google Scholar
5. Davis, L.L., Li, L., Darab, J.G., Li, H., Strachan, D.M., Allen, P.G., Bucher, J.J., Craig, I.M., Edelstein, N.M., and Shuh, D.K., submitted to the 1998 MRS Fall Meeting, Boston, MA, 1998 Google Scholar
6. Darab, J.G., Li, H., Schweiger, M.J., Vienna, J.D., Allen, P.G., Bucher, J.J., Edelstein, N.M., and Shuh, D.K., Plutonium Futures–The Science Conference Transactions, Report LA-13338-C, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 1997, pp. 143145.Google Scholar