Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-16T11:04:29.945Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Film Morphology, Excess Shunt Current and Stability in Triple-Junction Cells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

T.J. McMahon
Affiliation:
NREL, Golden CO 80401
M.S. Bennett
Affiliation:
Solarex Thin Film Division, Newtown, PA 18940.
Get access

Abstract

When a textured conductive textured oxide (CTO)-glass substrate is used for either thin single p-i-n or thin multilayer p-i-n structures, a new mode of light-induced cell degradation occurs which has been associated with enhanced shunting. In this study, triple-junction cells were examined before and after light-soaking using dark current-voltage (I-V) analysis. Two degradation mechanisms are occurring: i) The classical bulk Staebler-Wronski defect generation mechanism causes an increase in diode quality factor, ii) In cells exhibiting more as-grown shunting behavior, light-soaking greatly enhances shunting. This enhanced shunting becomes the primary mode of degradation.

Reversible incremental current steps are also seen when measuring the (I-V) characteristics on diodes with excess shunt current due to light-soaking. This is a clear indication that the increase in shunting is caused by an increase in the number of shunt pathways and not by enhancing current through existing shunts. Optical-beam-induced current (OBIC) scans show some small defect areas of reduced current responsivity that are about 5–10 urn in diameter and may not be caused by holes in the back reflector metalization. Localized accelerated light-induced degradation is measured using the OBIC scanning laser beam on small areas (5 × 10-6 cm2), and there is some evidence that these areas degrade more than areas without defects.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Tsuda, S., Nakamura, N., Watanabe, K., Takahama, T., Nishiwaki, H., Ohnishi, M. and Kuwano, Y., Solar Cells 9, 25 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Wieting, R.D., Bolingen, M., Anderson, J. and Willett, D., Proceedings of the 21st IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference 1568 (1990).Google Scholar
3. Staebler, D.L. and Wronski, C.R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 31, 292 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Goetzberger, A. and Stephens, C., J. of Appl. Phys. 32, 2646 (1961) and references therein.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Sakai, H., Yoshida, T., Hama, T. and Ichikawa, Y., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 29, 630 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. LeComber, P.G., Owen, A.E., Spear, W.E., Hajto, J., Snell, A.J., Choi, W.K., Rose, M.J. and Reynolds, S., J. Non-Cryst Sol. 77 & 78, 1373 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Dekkers, N.H. and de Lang, H, Optik 41, 452 (1974)Google Scholar