Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T06:12:17.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Film Growth: Control of Surface Morphology from Monodisperse Nanoparticles Through Fractals to Flat Epitaxial Heterostructures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2012

R. Stanley Williams ,
William M. Tong  and
Tue T. Ngo
R. Stanley Williams
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California Los Angeles 607 Circle Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90024-1569
William M. Tong
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California Los Angeles 607 Circle Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90024-1569
Tue T. Ngo
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California Los Angeles 607 Circle Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90024-1569
Get access

Abstract

The study of the morphology of surfaces produced by vapor deposition began over 125 years ago with Lord Kelvin. Since then, many researchers have addressed this topic from very different theoretical viewpoints, including thermodynamics, kinetics, fractal geometry, and numerical simulations. Only recently, however, have scanning probe microscopes become available to measure the three dimensional topography of a deposited film, which provided the quantitative experimental data necessary to test the different models of film growth. The concept of scaling provides a good first description of the morphology of vapor deposited films of all types, but for heteroepitaxial films, scaling is only approximately valid. The competition between the surface roughening caused by island nucleation and growth versus the smoothening actions of surface diffusion and desorption can lead to the formation of correlated structures on a surface with a dominant spatial frequency. By rational control of the film growth conditions, one can produce a surface covered by a low density of nearly monodisperse nanoparticles, an essentially fractal surface, or a planar film surface.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 367: Symposium P – Fractal Aspects of Materials , 1994 , 273
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Family, F. and Vicsek, T., J. Phys. A. 18, 75 (1985).Google Scholar
2. Tong, W.M. et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3374 (1994).Google Scholar
3. You, H. et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2900 (1993).Google Scholar
4. Eklund, E. A. et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1759 (1991).Google Scholar
5. Eklund, E.A. et al. , Surf. Sci. 285, 157 (1993).Google Scholar
6. Rudnick, J. and Bruinsma, R., in Low Energy Ion-Surface Interactions, edited by Rabalais, J.W. (Wiley, West Sussex, 1994) p.534.Google Scholar
7. Tong, W. M. and Williams, R. S., Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 45, 401 (1994).Google Scholar
8. Tong, W.M. et al. , Surf Sci. Lett., 277, L63 (1992). Color versions of the AFM images are posted on the World Wide Web -http://www.chem.ucla.edu/dept/gifs/RSW/AUWT4.GIF.Google Scholar
9. Bauer, E., Z. Krist. 110, 372 (1958).Google Scholar
10. Tong, W. M., PhD thesis, UCLA, 1994.Google Scholar
11. Bruinsma, R. et al. , in Kinetics of Ordering and Growth at Surfaces. edited by Lagally, M.G. (Plenum, New York, 1990) pp. 395–402.Google Scholar
12. Herring, C., J. Appl. Phys. 21, 301 (1950).Google Scholar
13. Mullins, W.W., J. Appl. Phys, 30, 77 (1959).Google Scholar
14. Edwards, S. F. and Wilkinson, D. R., Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A 381, 17 (1982).Google Scholar
15. Kardar, M., Parisi, G., and Zhang, Y.-C., Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 889 (1986).Google Scholar
16. Wolf, D. E. and Villain, J., Europhys. Lett. 13, 727 (1990).Google Scholar
17. Lai, Z.-W. and Sarma, S. Das, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2348 (1991).Google Scholar
18. Kern, R. et al. , in Current Topics in Materials Science, edited by Kaldis, E. (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1980).Google Scholar
19. Steyer, A. et al. , Phys. Rev. A 44, 8271 (1991).Google Scholar
20. Reiss, H., J. Chem. Phys. 19, 482 (1951).Google Scholar
21. Thomson, W., Phil. Mag. 42, 448 (1871).Google Scholar
22. Atkinson, H. V., Acta metall. 36, 469 (1988).Google Scholar
23. Frost, H. J. and Thompson, C. V., Acta metall. 35, 529 (1987).Google Scholar