Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Field Emission Response from Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes Grown on Different Metallic Substrates

  • Indranil Lahiri (a1), Raghunandan Seelaboyina (a2) and Wonbong Choi (a3)

Abstract

Carbon nanotubes (CNT) have seen a wide variety of applications, spread well beyond the semiconductor industries - especially in field emission related devices. For its widest possible application, it has become very much important to grow CNTs on a variety of metallic substrates and understand their field emission response. In the present study, multiwall CNTs (MWCNT), grown on pure metallic substrates like Cu, Al and W, were subjected to field emission tests under DC and AC bias. Choice of diffusion barrier layer and catalyst was also varied, to verify their effects on the emission response. Field emission behaviors from all such structures were compared with MWCNTs grown on Si. It was found that the MWCNTs grown on pure Cu substrate showed excellent field electron emission response, in terms of low turn-on field, high emission current, long time stability and very high field enhancement factor.

Copyright

References

Hide All
1. Choi, W.B., Chung, D.S., Kang, J.H., Kim, H.Y., Jin, Y.W., Han, I.T. et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, 3129 (1999).10.1063/1.125253
2. Charbonnier, F.M., Barbour, J., Garett, L.F. and Dyke, W.P., Proc. IEEE 51, 991 (1963).10.1109/PROC.1963.2379
3. Charbonnier, F.M., Appl. Surf. Sci. 94/95, 26 (1996).10.1016/0169-4332(95)00517-X
4. Teo, K.B.K., Minoux, E., Hudanski, L., Peauger, F., Schnell, J.P., Gangloff, L. et al., Nature 437, 968 (2005).10.1038/437968a
5. Jonge, N.de, Lamy, Y., Schoots, K. and Oosterkamp, T.H., Nature 420, 393 (2002).10.1038/nature01233
6. Zhang, J., Yang, G., Cheng, Y., Gao, B., Qiu, Q., Lee, Y.Z. et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 184104 (2005).10.1063/1.1923750
7. Heer, W.A.de, Chatelain, A. and Ugarte, D., Science 270, 1179 (1995).10.1126/science.270.5239.1179
8. Wang, Q.H., Setlur, A.A., Lauerhaas, J.M., Dai, J.Y., Seelig, E.W. and Chang, R.P.H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, 2912 (1998).10.1063/1.121493
9. Collins, P.G. and Zettl, A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 1969 (1996).10.1063/1.117638
10. Dai, H., Acc. Chem. Res. 35, 1035 (2002).10.1021/ar0101640
11. Talapatra, S., Kar, S., Pal, S.K., Vajtai, R., Ci, L., Victor, P. et al., Nature Nanotech. 1, 112 (2006).10.1038/nnano.2006.56
12. Lan, C., Srisungsitthisunt, P., Amama, P.B., Fisher, T.S., Xu, X. and Reifenberger, R.G., Nanotechnology 19, 125703 (2008).10.1088/0957-4484/19/12/125703
13. Kim, D., Lim, S.H., Guiley, A.J., Cojocaru, C.S., Bouree, J.E., Vila, L. et al., Thin Solid Films 519, 706 (2008).10.1016/j.tsf.2007.06.089
14. Yin, X., Wang, Q., Lou, C., Zhang, X. and Lei, W., Appl. Surf. Sci. 254, 6633 (2008).10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.04.040
15. Seelaboyina, R., Bodepalli, S., Noh, K., Leon, M. and Choi, W.B., Nanotechnology 19, 065605 (2008).10.1088/0957-4484/19/6/065605
16. Lahiri, I., Seelaboyina, R. and Choi, W.B., Carbon 48, (2010) (in press).
17. Lee, Y.-H., Choi, C.-H., Jang, Y.-T., Kim, E.-K. and B.-Ju, K., Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 745 (2002).10.1063/1.1490625
18.www.environmetalchemistry.com/yogi/periodic/electrical.html as viewed on 11 Nov. 2009.
19. McTeer, A., US Patent No. 6 204 179 B1 (20 March 2001).

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed