Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-tsvsl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T18:36:32.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Features of Semiconductors during Nanoindentation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Asta Richter
Affiliation:
University of Applied Sciences Wildau, Bahnhofstrasse 1, D-15745 Wildau, GERMANY
Bodo Wolf
Affiliation:
University of Applied Sciences Wildau, Bahnhofstrasse 1, D-15745 Wildau, GERMANY
Roger Smith
Affiliation:
Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE11 3TU, U. K.
Margita Günther
Affiliation:
Technical University Dresden, Department of Solid State Electronics, D-01062 Dresden, GERMANY
Get access

Abstract

Si and InSb were subject to depth sensing multi-cycling nanoindentation. The load-depthcurves exhibited hysteresis loops which are explained in terms of pressure induced phase transformations. In order to study the impact of crystal distortions on phase transformation, the specimens were subject to boron implantation (ion energy 180 keV) of different implantation doses (1014 to 1017 ions/cm2) and indented without annealing. In InSb, the hysteresis loops disappeared after implantation of 1016 ions/cm2, and for Si with its stronger bonds, a dose of 3*1016/cm2 is required for the same effect. Indentation cycling with constant maximum load results in a sudden disappearance of the hysteresis loop after a small gradual loop area reduction during the first initial cycles.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Boyer, H. E., Hardness Testing, ASM International, Metals Park, Ohio, 1987.Google Scholar
2. Bhushan, B. (Ed.), Micro-/Nanotribology and Its Application, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1997 (NATO ASI series E, vol. 330).Google Scholar
3. Oliver, W. C., Pharr, G. M., J. Mater. Res. 7 (1992 1564.Google Scholar
4. Bhushan, B., Kulkarni, A. V., Bonin, W., Wyrobek, J. T., Philos. Mag. A74 (1996 1117.Google Scholar
5. CrysTec GmbH Kristalltechnologie, Köpenicker Straβe 325, 12555 Berlin (Germany) Google Scholar
6. Witke, T., Schuelke, T., Schultrich, B., Siemroth, P., Surf. Coat. Technol. 126 (2000 81.Google Scholar
7. Sahre, K., Eichhorn, K.-J., Simon, F., Guenther, M., Suchaneck, G., Gerlach, G., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 672 (2001) O8.18.16.Google Scholar
8. Nix, W. D. and Gao, H., J. Mech. Phys. Solids 46 (1998 411.Google Scholar
9. George, A., in: Properties of Crystalline Silicon, Hull, R. Ed., INSPEC, The Institution of Electrical Engineers, London, 1999, p. 104.Google Scholar
10. Domnich, V., Gogotsi, Y., Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. 3 (2002 1.Google Scholar
11. Pearson's Handbook of Crystallographic Data for Intermetallic Phases - second edition, (Eds.: Villars, P., Calvert, L. D.), ASM International, Ohio, 1991.Google Scholar
12. Jamieson, J. C., Science 139 (1963 762.Google Scholar
13. Kasper, J. S., Richards, S. H., Acta Crystall. 17 (1964 752.Google Scholar
14. Kailer, A., Gogotsi, Y. G., Nickel, K. G., J. Appl. Phys. 81 (1997 3057.Google Scholar