Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T19:17:38.601Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Facile Fabrication and Integration of Patterned Nanostructured Titania into Microsystems: Effect of Parent Ti Microstructure on Kinetics of Reaction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Diana M. DeRosa
Affiliation:
National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA. Biosystems Engineering Department, and Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics Department, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.
Abu Samah Zuruzi
Affiliation:
Materials Department and Mechanical and Environmental Engineering Department, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.
Noel C. MacDonald
Affiliation:
Materials Department and Mechanical and Environmental Engineering Department, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.
Get access

Abstract

One promising route to integrate nanostructured titania (NST) into nano/micro electrical mechanical systems (N/MEMS) devices is by reacting Ti films with aqueous hydrogen peroxide (aq. H2O2) solution. However, little is known about the reaction kinetics between aq. H2O2 and Ti thin films. Here, the effect of Ti microstructure and film thickness on kinetics of reaction was investigated. For films less than 50 nm thick, the kinetics is interface-reaction controlled. For thicker films, the reaction is controlled by diffusion through a hydrated titania gel layer. Activation energies of these kinetics were extracted. Pore size of NST is affected by thickness of parent Ti films. Depending on thickness of parent Ti films, NST with average pore sizes ranging from 15 nm to 150 nm was formed. The ability to form integrated porous NST features with controllable pore sizes may have implications on the development of devices for drug delivery and macromolecular separation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Paunesku, T., Rajh, T., Wiederrecht, G., Maser, J., Vogt, S., Stojićević, N., Protić, M., Lai, B., Oryhon, J., Thurnauer, M., Woloschak, G., Nat. Mater. 2003, 2, 343.Google Scholar
[2] Grätzel, M., Nature 2001, 414, 338.Google Scholar
[3] Sberveglieri, G., Depero, L. E., Ferroni, M., Guidi, V., Martinelli, G., Nelli, P., Perego, C., Sangaletti, L., Adv. Mater. 1996, 8, 334.Google Scholar
[4] Varghese, O. K., Gong, D. W., Paulose, M., Ong, K. G., Dickey, E. C., Grimes, C. A., Adv. Mater. 2003, 15, 624.Google Scholar
[5] Gouma, P. I., Mills, M. J., Sandhage, K. H., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2000, 83, 1007.Google Scholar
[6] Zuruzi, A. S., MacDonald, N. C., Adv. Func. Mater. 2005, 15, 396.Google Scholar
[7] Tengvall, P., Lundstrom, I., Sjoqvist, L., Elwing, H., Bjurstein, L. M., Biomaterials 1989, 10, 166.Google Scholar
[8] Wu, J. M., Hayakawa, S., Tsuru, K., Osaka, A., Scripta Mater. 2002, 46, 101.Google Scholar
[9] Bearinger, J. P., Orme, C. A. and Gilbert, J. L., Biomaterials, 2003, 24, 1837.Google Scholar
[10] Murarka, S. P., Metallization: Theory and Practice for VLSI and ULSI. Butterworth Heinemann, Boston, 1993.Google Scholar
[11] Raspopov, S. A., Gusakov, A. G., Voropayev, A. G., Vecher, A. A., Savitski, A. A. and Grishin, V. K., J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans., 1996, 92, 2775.Google Scholar
[12] Weiss, B. Z., Tu, K. N., Smith, D. A., J. Appl. Phys. 1986, 59, 415.Google Scholar
[13] Samuni, A., J. Phys. Chem., 1972, 76, 634.Google Scholar
[14] Sever, R. S., Root, T. W., J. Phys. Chem. B., 2003, 107, 4090.Google Scholar