Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T06:30:21.998Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation on Stress and Optical Property of Thin Films Used in Optical MEMS Device

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Lianchao Sun
Affiliation:
SOPRA INC, Westford, MA
Ping Hou
Affiliation:
Nortel Networks Inc
Get access

Abstract

Control of the film stress and optical property has long been considered as an issue in the tunable optical MEMS (Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems) devices. In this paper, the atmospheric evolution of Titanium Dioxide (TiO2) and Silicon Dioxide (SiO2) thin films for the optical MEMS devices were studied. These films were prepared by ion-assisted e-beam evaporation. It is found that as-deposited SiO2 films exhibit compressive stress; whereas, it is tensile in the TiO2 films under present processing conditions. When annealed at 150 °C, both SiO2 and TiO2 films show slight changes in stress with annealing time. However, increasing the anneal temperature to 250°C caused an apparent change of film stresses with time, in which SiO2 film turns into less compressive and TiO2 film appears to be more tensile. The optical properties after annealing were also investigated by measuring the thickness and the refractive index changes using the spectroscopic ellipsometry technique. At both experimental temperatures, the film thickness increases slightly and the refractive index at 1550 nm decreases a little at the initial annealing stage for SiO2 films. For TiO2 films, it is found that the refractive index increases after annealing at 250°C. This might be caused by the TiO2 film densification process during amorphous-to-crystalline phase transformation. Because most of the significant film evolutions occur during the initial 12 hours of annealing, a practical way of stabilizing the film properties in a MEMS device is to pre-anneal the as-deposited thin films.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Bendavid, A., Martin, P. J., Jamting, A., and Takikawa, H., Thin Solid Films 355, (1999), 611.Google Scholar
2 Brunet-Bruneau, A., Fisson, S., Gallas, B., Vuye, G., and Rivory, J., Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering 3738, (1999), 188196.Google Scholar
3 Bhattacharyya, D., Sahoo, N. K., Thakur, S., and Das, N. C., Thin Solid Films 360, (2000), 96102.Google Scholar
4 DeLoach, J. D. and Aita, C. R., J. Vac. Sci. Technol A16, (1998), 1963 –1968.Google Scholar
5 Demiryont, H., Kerwin, D. B., and Sites, J. R., National Bureau of Standards, Special Publication, (1985), 311316.Google Scholar
6 Gartner, M., Parlog, C., and Osiceanu, P., Thin Solid Films 234, (1993), 561565.Google Scholar
7 Grahn, J. V., Linder, M., and Fredriksson, E., J. Vac. Sci. Technol A16, (1998), 2495 –2500.Google Scholar
8 Imai, H., Morimoto, H., Tominaga, A., and Hirashima, H., Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology 10, (1997), 4554.Google Scholar
9 Sun, L. and Hou, P., Thin Solid Films, (To be published).Google Scholar
10 Parjadis, G., Lariviere., d., Frigerio, J. M., Bridou, F., and Rivory, J., Thin Solid Films 234, (1993), 458462.Google Scholar
11 Hou, P. and Sun, L., MRS Proceedings Series 749, (2002), 101 –106.Google Scholar
12 Stoney, G., Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 82, (1909), 172.Google Scholar
13 Windischmann, H. and Epps, D. F., J. Appl. Phys. 69, (1991), 2231.Google Scholar
14 Yasumi, Y., Haruo, U., Shigeyuki, W., and Hisakazu, N., Applied Optics 38, (1999), 66386641.Google Scholar
15 Nguyen Van, V., Fisson, S., Frigerio, J. M., Rivory, J., Vuye, G., Wang, Y., and Abeles, F., Thin Solid Films 253, (1994), 257 – 261.Google Scholar
16 Koch, R., J. Phys: Condens. Matter 6, (1994), 95199550.Google Scholar