Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T04:12:02.633Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of the Effective Radius of Spherical Indenters for Ultra-Microindentation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

T. J. Bell
Affiliation:
CSIRO Telecommunications and Industrial Physics, Sydney, Australia
J. S. Field
Affiliation:
CSIRO Telecommunications and Industrial Physics, Sydney, Australia
F. J. Lesha
Affiliation:
CSIRO Telecommunications and Industrial Physics, Sydney, Australia
M. V. Swain
Affiliation:
CSIRO Telecommunications and Industrial Physics, Sydney, Australia
Get access

Abstract

To determine the mechanical properties of materials, using spherical ultra-microindentation techniques, the geometry of the part of the indenter in contact with the surface must be well known. However, crystallographic anisotropy ensures that nominally spherical diamond indenters with very small tip radii will not be truly spherical. This paper examines the shape of typical indenters, with nominal tip radii of 5 μm and 10 μm. Atomic force microscopy techniques are used to determine the general form and then using a technique based on Hertzian contact mechanics in combination with load/penetration data obtained by indentation, to determine the effective radius of the part of the indenter in actual contact with the surface.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bell, T. J., Bendeli, A., Field, J. S., Swain, M. V.and Thwaite, E. G.The Determination of Surface Plastic and Elastic Properties by Ultra Micro-indentation”, Metrologia, 28, 463469, 1991/1992.Google Scholar
2. Field, J. S. & Swain, M. V., J. Mater. Res., 10, 1, 101112, Jan, 1995.Google Scholar
3. Hertz, H., Miscellaneous Papers, Macmillan, London, p146, 1896.Google Scholar
4. Meyer, E., Vereines, Zeits. d., Deutsch. Ingenieure, 52, 645, 740, 835, 1908 Google Scholar
5. Tabor, D., The Hardness of Metals, Clarendon Press, 1951.Google Scholar