Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T07:09:05.822Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of Single Semiconductor Defects Using Multiple Microanalysis Techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

P. D. Kinney
Affiliation:
MicroTherm, LLC, Minneapolis, MN
Y. Uritsky
Affiliation:
Applied Materials, Inc., Santa Clara, CA
E. L. Principae
Affiliation:
Charles Evans and Associates, Redwood City, CA
R. Savoy
Affiliation:
Applied Materials, Inc., Santa Clara, CA
I. Mowat
Affiliation:
Charles Evans and Associates, Redwood City, CA
L. McCaig
Affiliation:
Charles Evans and Associates, Redwood City, CA
Get access

Abstract

New analytical techniques are being employed to meet the stringent requirements for controlling defects in semiconductor manufacturing. While SEM/EDX continues to be an effective tool for root-cause analysis of particles and defects on the wafer surface, increasingly it is necessary to employ multiple techniques in analysis of a single defect to obtain sufficient information to resolve the problem. Until recently, this approach was impractical because the defects were too difficult to locate in standard analytical tools, especially on unpatterned wafers. But with the newly developed Mark-Assisted Defect Analysis (MADA) technique, the positioning problem has been eliminated, and it is a simple matter to employ multiple techniques on the same defect. In this paper we present results for defects analyzed by SEM/EDX, TOFSIMS, μ-ESCA, and AUGER, highlighting how these techniques compliment each other. Particular emphasis is given to the issue of the analytical technique changing the sample chemistry and influencing the results of subsequent analysis techniques.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1) Diebold, A. C., Uritsky, Y., Brundel, D., Francis, T., Fatemi, H., Childs, K., and Clough, S.Understanding the Physical Metrology Needs for Ultra Clean Manufacture of Future Silicon Integrated Circuits”. in Future Fab International, I, I, 1996.Google Scholar
(2) Childs, K.D., Narum, D., LaVanier, L.A., Lindley, P). M., Schuler, B.W., Mulholland, G., and Diebold, A.C., “A Comparison of Sub-Micron Particle Analysis by Auger Electron Spectroscopy, Time-of-Flight SIMS, and EDS,” 4 2nd Nat′l Symp. of the AVS, Mpls., MN, October 16–25, 1995.Google Scholar