Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-s5tfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-04T02:21:54.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of Anisotropic Film Structure of Amorphous Alloy by Computer Simulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

A. SATO
Affiliation:
College of Science and Technology, Nihon Univ.7-24-1 Narashinodai, Funabahi-shi, Chiba 274, Japan.
H. YAMAMOTO
Affiliation:
College of Science and Technology, Nihon Univ.7-24-1 Narashinodai, Funabahi-shi, Chiba 274, Japan.
Get access

Abstract

A film growth of a virtual GdCo amorphous binary alloy was studied with a molecular dynamics simulation. A deviation of the atomic environment δ and an atomic pair distribution index η were calculated to evaluate the atomic structure of the prepared film. It was found that an anisotropic atomic distribution is induced in the film. The value of δ for a Gd atom environment is of the order of 10−4 and is almost in quantitatively agreement with the experimental value. The anelastic deformation is affected by the roughness of the substrate and becomes large in the film deposited on a smooth substrate. The value of η shows that the atomic pairs preferentially orient toward a horizontal film plane. The obtained results strongly support a single ion model as a main origin of a perpendicular magnetic anisotropy experimentally observed in amorphous rare earth-transition metal alloy films.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Gambino, R. J., Ziegler, J. and Cuomo, J. J., Appl. Phys. Lett., 24, 99 (1974).Google Scholar
2 Henderson, D., Brodsky, M. H. and Chaudhari, P., Appl. Phys. Lett., 25, 641 (1974).Google Scholar
3 Zwingman, R., Wilson, W. L. Jr., and Bourrne, H. C. Jr., Joint M3 -Intermag Conf., 4 A-2 (1976).Google Scholar
4 Suzuki, Y., Takayama, S. and Ohta, N., IEEE Trans. Magn., MAG–23, 2275 (1987).Google Scholar
5 Hellman, F. and Gyorgy, E. M., Phys. Rev. Lett., 68, 1391 (1992).Google Scholar
6 Hara, K. et al. , Phys. Rev. B, 39, 9476 (1989).Google Scholar
7 Schneider, M., Rahman, A. and Schuller, I. K., Phys. Rev. Lett., 55, 604 (1985).Google Scholar
8 Schneider, M., Rahman, A. and Schuller, I. K., Phys. Rev. B, 34, 1802 (1986).Google Scholar
9 Sato, A. and Yamamoto, H., Trans. Mat. Res. Soc. Jpn., 15B, 1201 (1994).Google Scholar
10 Gambino, R. J. and Cuomo, J. J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., 15, 296 (1978).Google Scholar
11 Nishihara, Y., Katayama, T., Yamaguchi, Y., Ogawa, S. and Tsushima, T., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 17, 1083 (1978).Google Scholar
12 Gambino, R. J., Chaudhari, P. and Cuomo, J. J., AIP Conf. Proc., 18, 573 (1978).Google Scholar