Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T15:18:49.103Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Equation of State of Fluid NH3 from P-V-T and Ultrasound Measurements to 12 Kbar

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

R. L. Mills
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545;
D. H. Liebenberg
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545;
R. Le Sar
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545;
PH. Pruzan
Affiliation:
Universite Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris VI, 75230 Paris 05, France
Get access

Abstract

A piston-cylinder apparatus was used to measure the pressure, volume, temperature, and ultrasonic velocity (P,V,T,u) of fluid NH3 from 195 to 320 K at pressures up to 12 kbar. Over 1200 sets of P-V-T-u and P-V-T data were fitted to a Tait-type equation of state (EOS) by non-linear least-squares minimization. With quadratic terms in T for the two fitted parameters, the rms deviation is ± 0.2% in V and ± 0.9% in u, which is comparable to the experimental error. The simple Tait EOS is useful over the entire fluid range between the vaporization and melting curves up to T exceeding room temperature. Measurements of u and calculations of the constant-pressure heat capacity Cp show regular behavior, differing noticeably from values given by a 44-parameter EOS recently published by NBS. It is concluded that incorporating u in the formulation of an EOS improves its self consistency markedly.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Slobodkin, L. S., Barykov, I. F., Cess, R. D., and Caldwell, J., J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 20, 481 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Haar, L. and Gallagher, J. S., J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 7, 635 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Pruzan, Ph., Liebenberg, D. H., and Mills, R. L., Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1200 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Mills, R. L., Liebenberg, D. H., and Pruzan, Ph., J. Phys. Chem. 86, 5219 (1982).Google Scholar
5. Mills, R. L., Liebenberg, D. H., and Bronson, J. C., J. Chem. Phys. 63, 1198 (1975).Google Scholar
6. Hirschfelder, J. O., Curtiss, C. F., and Bird, R. B., Molecular Theory of Gases and Liquids (Wiley, New York 1954).Google Scholar
7. Kumagai, A. and Toriumi, T., J. Chem. Eng. Data 16, 293 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Liebenberg, D. H., Mills, R. L., and Bronson, J. C., J. Appl. Phys. 45, 741 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Mills, R. L., Liebenberg, D. H., Bronson, J. C., and Schmidt, L. C., J. Chem. Phys. 66, 3076 (1977).Google Scholar
10. Bowen, D. E. and Thompson, J. C., J. Chem. Eng. Data 13, 206 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar