Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T01:38:49.179Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EPR of Cu(II) in Sol-Gel Prepared SiO2 Glass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

S. Dave  and
R. K. Maccrone
S. Dave
Affiliation:
Perkin Elmer, 761 Main Ave., Norwalk, CT 06859-0420
R. K. Maccrone
Affiliation:
Materials Engineering Department and Department of Physics, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180-3590
Get access

Abstract

SiO2 glass has been prepared by the hydrolysis of TEOS in alcohol using HCl and NH4OH to control the pH. Copper ions were incorporated from the acetate to act as structural probe ions during the process of gellation and calcination. The local structure of copper ions was investigated using EPR determined at 300 K and 10 K.

It was found that the pH of the solution had a profound effect on the EPR spectra of the copper in the gels and glasses, indicating differences in the local structure.

Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 73: Symposium H – Better Ceramics Through Chemistry II , 1986 , 605
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Keefer, K.D., in Better Ceramics Through Chemistry, MRS Symposium Vol. 32, Eds. Brinker, C.J., Clark, D.E. and Ulrich, D.R., (1984), p. 15.Google Scholar
2. Schaefer, D.W. and Keefer, K.D., Better Ceramics Through Chemistry, MRS Symposium Vol. 32, Eds. Brinker, C.J., Clark, D.E. and Ulrich, D.R., (1984), p. 1.Google Scholar
3. Brinker, C.J., Drotning, W.D. and Scherer, G.W., Better Ceramics Through Chemistry, MRS Symposium Vol.32, Eds. Brinker, C.J., Clark, D.E. and Ulrich, D.R., (1984), p. 25.Google Scholar
4. See also many papers in this symposium, esp. V.V. Mainz et al. and C.A. Salfe.Google Scholar
5. Bleaney, B., Proc. Roy. Soc. 42 (1951) 441.Google Scholar
6. Hathaway, B.J. and Hodgson, P.G., J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 35 (1983) 4071.Google Scholar
7. Imagawa, H., Phys. Stat. Sol., 30 (1968) 469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Kawazoe, H., Hosono, H., and Kanazawa, T., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 29 (1978) 173.Google Scholar
9. Duran, A. and Navarro, J.M. Fernandez, Phys. Chem. Glasses, 26 (1985) 126.Google Scholar
10. Kivelson, D. and Neiman, R., J. Chem. Phys. 35 (1961) 149.Google Scholar
11. Maki, A.H. and McGarvey, B.R., J. Chem. Phys. 33 (1960) 1074.Google Scholar
12. Griscom, D., Private Communication (1986).Google Scholar