Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T18:20:53.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Enhancement of Mercuric Iodide Detector Performance Through Crystal Growth in Microgravity: the Roles of Lattice Order

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Bruce Steiner ,
Lodewijk Van Den Berg  and
Uri Laor
Bruce Steiner
Affiliation:
NIST, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, bruce.steiner@nist.gov
Lodewijk Van Den Berg
Affiliation:
EG&G Energy Systems, Goleta, CA, now at Constellation Technology Corp., Largo, FL 33777
Uri Laor
Affiliation:
on leave at NIST from the Nuclear Research Centre, Be'er Sheva 84910, Israel
Get access

Abstract

The hole-mobility•carrier-lifetime product of α mercuric iodide high energy radiation detectors has been enhanced through vapor crystal growth in microgravity. This improvement is closely correlated with specific characteristics of the crystal lattice, which have been identified by high resolution synchrotron x-ray diffraction imaging. These structural features and the associated performance are now being approached in terrestrial growth of α mercuric iodide.

Gravity may affect the uniformity of this crystal lattice in two distinct ways: 1) directly through deformation that it imposes on the lattice during growth and 2) indirectly through convection, which mixes any extraneous material. Inclusions associated with these processes harden the lattice and facilitate lattice folding. These changes affect the electronic parameters of detectors made from the crystals. As purification procedures are optimized, the incorporation of extraneous material is curtailed, enhancing electronic properties in spite of lattice flexing through loss of precipitation hardening.

These studies provide insight into the contribution of various aspects of crystalline order in α-mercuric iodide crystals to property improvement. This knowledge has led to modification of requirements for starting materials, adjustment of physical vapor growth procedures, and change in crystal handling procedures. As a result, the electronic performance of terrestrially grown radiation detectors has been improved, and we provide evidence that further enhancement is still possible.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 487: Symposium I – Semiconductors for Room-Temperature Radiation II , 1997 , 345
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 van den Berg, L. and Schnepple, W. F., “Mercuric Iodide Crystal Growth in Space,” Nucl. Inst. Meth. Phys. Res. A 283, 335–338 (1989)Google Scholar
2 van den Berg, L., “Growth of Single Crystals of Mercuric Iodide on the Ground and in Space,” Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 302, 73–38 (1993)Google Scholar
3 Schnepple, W.F., van den Berg, L., and Skinner, N., “Growth of HgI2 Single Crystals in Spacelab III”, J. Spacecraft Rockets 16, 441 (1979)Google Scholar
4 Kaldis, E., Cadoret, R., and Schönherr, E., “Crystal Growth from the Vapour Phase” in Walter, H. U., ed. “Fluid Sciences and Materials Science in Space” (Springer, New York, 1987)Google Scholar
5 Steiner, Bruce, Kuriyama, Masao, and Dobbyn, Ronald C., “Insight into the Genesis of Irregularity during Crystal Growth Achieved through High Sensitivity Monochromatic Synchrotron X-Radiation Diffraction Imaging (Topography),” Prog. Crystal Growth and Char. 20, 189–216 (1990)Google Scholar
6 Gerrish, V. M., “Characterization and Quantification of Detector Performance” in Schlesinger, T. E. and James, R. B., ed., Semiconductors for Room Temperature Nuclear Detector Applications, Semiconductors and Semimetals 43, 493–530 (1995)Google Scholar
7 Schieber, M., Schnepple, W.F., and van den Berg, L., Vapor Growth of HgI2 by Periodical Source or Crystal Temperature Oscillation”, J. Cryst. Growth 33, 125–135 (1976)Google Scholar
8 Remy, F., Gastaldi, J., and LeLay, G., “Observation of Bulk Growth Defects in α-HgI2 Single Crystals by Synchrotron X-ray Transmission Topography”, Nucl. Inst. Meth. Phys. Res. B 83, 229–234 (1993)Google Scholar
9 Gits, S., Characterizationo f Extended Defects in α-HgI2 Single Crystals”, Nucl. Inst. Meth. 213, 43–50 (1983)Google Scholar
10 Schieber, M, Ortale, C., van den Berg, L., Schnepple, W., Keller, L., Wagner, C.N.J., Yelon, W., Ross, F., Georgeson, G., and Milstein, F., “- Correlation between Mercuric Iodide Detector Performance and Crystalline Perfection”, Nucl Inst. Meth. Phys. Res. A283, 172–187 (1989)Google Scholar
11 Burger, A., Morgan, S., He, C., Silberman, E., van den Berg, L., Ortale, C., Franks, L., and Schieber, M., “A Study of Inhomogeneity and Deviations from Stoichiometry in Mercuric Iodide,” J. Cryst. Growth 99, 988–993 (1990)Google Scholar
12 Steiner, Bruce, van den Berg, Lodewijk, and Laor, Uri, “High resolution Diffraction Imaging of Mercuric Iodide: Demonstration of the Necessity for Alternate Crystal Processing Techniques for Highly Purified Material.” Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 375, 259–264 (1995)Google Scholar