Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T13:33:17.750Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Enhanced Graphite Fiber Electrodes for a Microbial Biofuel Cell Employing Marine Sediments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

Gregory Konesky*
Affiliation:
ATH Ventures Inc., 3 Rolling Hill Rd., Hampton Bays, NY 11946
Get access

Abstract

A microbial biofuel cell has been demonstrated utilizing organic material in the sediment as fuel and dissolved oxygen in the overlying seawater as the oxidizer. A graphite electrode placed in the sediment acts as the anode and collects electrons both by mediated and non-mediated processes. Another graphite electrode suspended in the seawater above the sediment acts as the cathode and transfers these electrons to oxygen in the seawater. The sediment serves as a natural permeable membrane that permits hydrogen ions to flow from within the sediment and combine with the oxygen to produce water. Electrons which flow from the anode to the cathode through an interconnecting wire are used to power external circuits. Both fuel and oxidizer are naturally present and self-renewing, and the graphite electrodes are inexpensive and non-toxic. Overall, this is a very “green” fuel cell. A significant improvement in collection efficiency is demonstrated by using graphite fiber electrodes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Lovley, D. and Chapelle, F., “Deep Surface Microbial Processes”, Reviews of Geophysics, 33, 3, 365–381 (1995).Google Scholar
2. Myers, C. and Myers, J., “Localization of Cytochromes to the Outer Membrane of Anaerobically Grown Shewanella putrefaciens MR-1”, Journal of Bacteriology, 174, 34293438 (1992).Google Scholar
3. Seeliger, S., Cordruwisch, R. and Schink, B., “A Periplasmic and Extracellular C-Type Cytochrome of Geobacter sulfurreducens”, Journal of Bacteriology 180, 36863691 (1998).Google Scholar
4. Lower, S., Hochella, M. Jr. and Beveridge, T., “Bacterial Recognition of Mineral Surfaces”, Science, 292, 13601363 (18 May 2001).Google Scholar
5. Newman, D., “How Bacteria Respire Minerals”, Science, 292, 13121313.Google Scholar
6. Kim, B., Kim, H., Hyun, M. and Park, D., “Direct Electrode Reaction of an Fe(III)-reducing Bacterium Shewanella putrefaciens”, Journal of Bacteriology, 9, 127131 (1999).Google Scholar
7. Reimers, C., Tender, L., Fertig, S. and Wang, W., “Harvesting Energy from the Marine Sediment-Water Interface”, Environmental Science and Technology, 35, 192195 (2001).Google Scholar
8. Rao, B., Giacomo, J Jr. Kobasz, W., Hosom, D., Weller, R. and Hinton, A., “Seawater Battery for Ocean Buoys”, Sea Technology, 6366 (Nov. 1992).Google Scholar
9. Bond, D., Holmes, D., Tender, L. and Lovley, D., “Electrode-Reducing Microorganisms that Harvest Energy from Marine Sediments”, Science, 295, 483485 (18 Jan. 2002).Google Scholar
10. Graphite Fiber Electrodes were obtained from Small Parts, Inc. Miami Lakes, FL. P/N B-FFHS-0912.Google Scholar