Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T17:15:30.562Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Energy and Depth Distributions of Interface States and bulk Traps and their Electronic Effects in GalnAs/GaAs Heterojuntions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Z. C. Huang ,
C. R. Wie ,
D. Johnstone ,
C. E. Stutz  and
K. R. Evans
Z. C. Huang
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Center for Electronic and Electro-optic Materials, State University of New York at Buffalo, Bonner Hall, Buffalo, NY 14260
C. R. Wie
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Center for Electronic and Electro-optic Materials, State University of New York at Buffalo, Bonner Hall, Buffalo, NY 14260
D. Johnstone
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Center for Electronic and Electro-optic Materials, State University of New York at Buffalo, Bonner Hall, Buffalo, NY 14260
C. E. Stutz
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Center for Electronic and Electro-optic Materials, State University of New York at Buffalo, Bonner Hall, Buffalo, NY 14260
K. R. Evans
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Center for Electronic and Electro-optic Materials, State University of New York at Buffalo, Bonner Hall, Buffalo, NY 14260
Get access

Abstract

We have studied the lattice-mismatch-induced defects both at the interface and in the bulk (GaAs buffer layer ) of Ga0.92In0.08As/GaAs heterojunctions by means of C-V characteristics and constant capacitance deep level transient spectroscopy (CC-DLTS). The Ga0.92In0.08As (n+)/GaAs (P) samples, with the thickness of GalnAs layer at 0.1μm, 0.25μm, 0.5μm, and 1.0μm, were grown by MBE. The depth profiles of bulk hole traps in the GaAs buffer layer were measured by the DLTS technique as a function of the in-plane lattice mismatch. The concentration of lattice-mismatch-induced traps decreased exponentially with distance away from the interface. The depth distributions of the mismatch-induced bulk traps appeared to be affected by the pre-existing bulk traps and the dopant impurities in the GaAs buffer layer. Energy distribution of the interface states was obtained by the CC-DLTS and C-V measurements independently. All heterojunctions showed a minimum in the interface state density at about EV+0.83eV. The U-shaped energy distribution with donor- and acceptor-like states is interpreted by the disorder-induced-gap-states model.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 240: Symposium E – Advanced III-V Compound Semiconductor Growth, Processing and Devices , 1991 , 633
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Matthews, J. W., Mader, S., and Light, T. B., J. Appl. Phys., 41, 3800 (1970)Google Scholar
2. Chen, C. Y., Chu, S. N. G., and Cho, A. Y., Appl. Phys. Lett., 46, 1145 (1985)Google Scholar
3. Krishnamoorthy, V., Ribas, P., and Park, R. M., Appl. Phys. Lett., 58, 2000 (1991)Google Scholar
4. Bhattacharya, P. K., Buhlmann, H.-J., and Ilegems, M., Appl. Phys. Lett., 41, 449 (1982)Google Scholar
5. Fitzgerald, E. A. and Ast, D. G., Kirchner, P. D., Pettit, G. D., and Woodall, J. M., J. Appl. Phys., 68, 693 (1988)Google Scholar
6. Choi, Y. W., Wie, C. R., Evans, K. R., and Stutz, C. E., J. Appl. Phys., 68, 1303 (1990)Google Scholar
7. Schaff, W. J. and Eastman, L. F., E-MRS Meeting, June 1987, Vol. XVI, p.295 Google Scholar
8. Ashizawa, Y., Akbar, S., Schaff, W. J., and Eastman, L. F., Fitzgerald, E. A. and Ast, D. G., J. Appl. Phys., 64, 4065 (1988)Google Scholar
9. DeJule, R. Y., Hasse, M. A., Ruby, D. S., and Stillman, G. E., Solid State Electronics, 28, 639 (1985)Google Scholar
10. Chappel, T. I., Ransom, C. M., Rev. Sci. Instru., 55, 200 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Choi, Y. W., Xie, K., Kim, H. M., and Wie, C. R., J. Electr. Mater., 20, 545 (1991)Google Scholar
12. Mitonneau, A., Martin, G. M., Mircea, A., Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. 33, 73 (1977)Google Scholar
13. Ikeda, E., Hasegawa, H., Ohtsuka, S. and Ohno, H., Jap. J. Appl. Phys., 27, 180 (1988)Google Scholar
14. Kasano, H. and Hosoki, S., J. Appl. Phys., 46, 394 (1975)Google Scholar
15. Johnson, N. M., J. Vac. Sci. & Technol., 21, 303 (1982)Google Scholar
16. Hasegawa, H. and Ohno, H., J. Vac. Sci. & Technol., B4, 1130 (1986)Google Scholar
17. Hasegawa, H., He, Li, Ohno, H., Sawade, T., Haga, T., Abe, Y. and Takahashi, H., J. Vac. Sci. & Technol., B5, 1097 (1987)Google Scholar