Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Encapsulation of Radioiodine in Cementitious Waste Forms

  • M. Atkins (a1) and F.P. Glasser (a1)

Abstract

Risk assessment models applied to radioactive waste repository design disclose that iodine is one of the nuclides causing most concern. Computer calculations for these scenario studies assume that iodine, in the form of I, is poorly sorbed on most geological materials. Therefore it is important that iodine be retained at source, ie. within the vault, for as long as is practicable.

In the UK context, cements are likely to form a major part of the waste package for low and medium active wastes, and of engineered vault structures. These cements are likely to be blends of one form or another, including Portland cement blended with blast furnace slag, or fly ash. It is therefore important to assess the effect of Portland cement and blending agent on iodine speciation and uptake by the constituent solid phases. Data are presented on the uptake of I on specific phases: Ca(OH)2, calcium aluminate sulphate hydrates, hydrotalcite and calcium silicate hydrogel (C-S-H). Combining this with a model for predicting phase assemblages in well-aged slag cements, yields an optimum blend for immobilising radioiodide, on ageing.

Precipitation of I as AgI during cementation and radiolytic effects on I are also discussed. The production of gaseous radioiodine (I2) is potentially a serious problem.

Copyright

References

Hide All
1.Nagra Report Project Gewahr (1985).
2. Thompson, G.B.J. and Broyd, T.W., DOE Report DOE/RW/86.076 (1986).
3.see Liu, Y. and Gunten, H.R. von, Nagra Report 88–29 (1988).
4. Heitanen, R., Jaakkola, T. and Miettinen, J.K., in ‘Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VIII’, MRS Proc. 44, p.891898, (1985).
5. Allard, B., Eliasson, L., Hoglund, S. and Andersson, K., KBS Report 84–15, (1984).
6. Andersson, K., Torstenfelt, B. and Allard, B., in ‘Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VII’, p.235242, (1981).
7. Glasser, F.P. et al, DOE Report to be published.
8. Sugawara, K. and Terada, K., Nature 182, p.250–1, (1958).
9. Smith, J.D. and Buttler, E.C.V., Nature 277, p.468–9, (1979).
10. Atkins, M., Macphee, D.E. and Glasser, F.P., in ‘Proc. Third Int. Conf. Fly Ash, Silica Fume, Slag, Natural Pozzolans in Cocrete’, Vol.1, p.7395, (1989).
11. Sharland, S.M., Tasker, P.W. and Tweed, C.J., in ‘Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management X’, p.683694, (1987).
12. Glasser, F.P., Rahman, A.A., Macphee, D., Atkins, M., Beckley, N. and Carson, S., CEC Report F1 1W O025UK(H), May-Dec. 1986.
13. Luke, K. and Glasser, F.P., Il Cemento 85, p.179192, (1988).
14. Brown, D.R. and Grutzeck, M.W., in ‘Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VIII’, MRS Proc. 44, p.911918, (1985).
15.pers. obs.
16. Wilding, C.R. and McHugh, G., Report No. AERE 12297, Harwell, UK, 16pp., (1986).
17. Miyata, S., Clays and Clay Minerals 31, p.305311, (1983).
18. Mascolo, G., Cem. Concr. Res. 16, p.610612, (1986).
19. Glasser, F.P., Macphee, D., Atkins, M., Pointer, C. and Wilding, C.R., CEC Report F1 1W0025UK(H), Jan.-June 1988.
20. Macphee, D.E., Atkins, M. and Glasser, F.P., in ‘Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XII’, MRS Proc. 127, (1989).
21. Brown, P.W., 8th. Int. Conf. Chem. Cem., Vol.3, Theme 2, p.231238, (1986).
22. Wagman, D.D., Evans, W.H., Parker, V.B., Schumm, R.H., Halow, I., Bailey, S.M. Bailey, K.L., Churney, K.L. and Nuttall, R.L., ‘The NBS Tables of Chemical Thermodynamic Proerties’, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, Vol.11, supp.no.2, (1982).
23. Bard, A.J., Parsons, R. and Jordan, J., ‘Standard Potentials in Aqueous Solution’, M.Decker (pub.), (1985).
24. Vovk, I.F., Radiochimica Acta 44/45, p.195199, (1988).

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed