Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-89wxm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T02:01:44.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electromigration Performance of Fluorinated Aluminum Films for VLSI Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

K. P. MacWilliams
Affiliation:
The Aerospace Corporation P.O. Box 92957 M2-244 Los Angeles, CA 90009
W. E. Yamada
Affiliation:
The Aerospace Corporation P.O. Box 92957 M2-244 Los Angeles, CA 90009
S. Brown
Affiliation:
The Aerospace Corporation P.O. Box 92957 M2-244 Los Angeles, CA 90009
G. K. Yabiku
Affiliation:
The Aerospace Corporation P.O. Box 92957 M2-244 Los Angeles, CA 90009
L. Lowry
Affiliation:
JPL / Cal Tech 4800 Oak Grove Dr. MS158-103 Pasadena, CA 91109
M. Isaac
Affiliation:
The Aerospace Corporation P.O. Box 92957 M2-244 Los Angeles, CA 90009
Get access

Abstract

We have previously shown greatly enhanced resistance to stressinduced hillock formation through fluorine incorporation in aluminum films. Utilizing relatively low F incorporation (<0.1 atomic %), hillock formation density is reduced ∼10x over pure or similarly Cu-doped aluminum films. Electromigration tests were performed on a matrix of structures with varying topology (step heights and slopes) and fluorine incorporation dose. We find that although F improves the stress-induced hillock formation by an order of magnitude, the electromigration performance of flat structures is only slightly improved with F incorporation. Analyzing various step heights and step slopes, the nonfluorinated Al experienced a decreasing electromigration lifetime with increasing step height. However, the optimally implanted F samples showed almost no lifetime reduction with step coverages over a similar regime. In addition, scanning electron micrographs of the failed samples revealed that the failures of the fluorinated samples differ markedly from the non-fluorinated samples. Finally, SIMS profiles taken on F and Cu (for comparison) implanted samples reveal the fundamentally different nature of the two beneficial components: Cu redistributes relatively easily throughout the Al film to segregate to grain boundaries. In contrast, the F profile is extremely stable with simnilar anneals and provides its beneficial effect by forming a distributed refractory metal-like structure within the interconnect.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Rey, A., Noel, P. and Jeuch, P., Proc. 1984 VLSI MIC Conf., Vol.139, 1984.Google Scholar
[2] Hosoda, T., et al., Proc. 27th IEEE Int. Reliab. Phys. Symp., p.206, 1989.Google Scholar
[3] Howard, J.K., White, J.F. and Ho, P.S., J. Appl. Phys., Vol.49, p.4083, 1978.Google Scholar
[4] Faith, T.J., J. Appl. Phys., Vol.52, p.4630, 1981.Google Scholar
[5] MacWilliams, K.P., et al., IEEE Symp on VLSI Tech., p.33, 1990.Google Scholar
[6] Kisselgof, L., et al., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., Vol.225, p.107, 1991.Google Scholar