Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T18:33:29.991Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electrical Properties of (Zn, Mn) Containing Multilayer Metallizations to p-Type InGaAs/InP

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Patrick W. Leec
Affiliation:
Telstra Research Laboratories, Clayton, 3168, Victoria, Australia
Geoffrey K. Reeves
Affiliation:
Royad Melbourne Institute of Technology, 3001, Victoria, Australia
Wei Zhou
Affiliation:
Royad Melbourne Institute of Technology, 3001, Victoria, Australia
Get access

Abstract

The specific contact resistance, pc, of Au/Zn/Au, Ni/Zn/Ni/Au, Pd/Zn/Pt/Au and Pd/Mln/Sb/Pd/Au contacts to p-In0.47Ga0.53As/ InP has been measured as a function of layer thickness of Zn or Mn. All of the as-deposited contacts were ohmic, with pc = 1−2 × 10−5 Ω cm2. Increasing thickness of the Zn layer above 200 Å in the Au/Zn/Au contacts resulted in a minor decrease in pc while producing no change in the Ni/Zn/Ni/Au metallization. For the as-deposited Pd/Mn/Pd/Au contacts, the value of pc was independent of thickness of the Mn layer but differences in pc emerged at annealing temperatures of ≥ 250°. The analysis of these structures by RBS has shown an extensive intermixing of the metal layers at an annealing temperature of 450 °. In the Pd/Zn/Pt/Au contacts, the value of pc was reduced to a minimum value of 8 × 10−6 Ω cm2 by annealing at a temperature of 500 °. An examination of the Pd/Zn/Pt/Au configuration by RBS has shown that the Pt layer acted as a barrier for the indiffusion of the Au.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Leech, P.W. and Reeves, G.K., Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 318, Boston, MA, (1993).Google Scholar
2. Leech, P.W., Reeves, G.K. and Kibel, M.H., J.Appl.Phys., 76(8), 4713, (1994).Google Scholar
3. Piotrowska, A., Kaminska, E., Kwiatkowski, S. and Turos, A., J.Appl.Phys., 73 (9), 4404, (1993).Google Scholar
4. Han, C.C., Wang, X.Z., Lau, S.S., Potenski, R.M., Tischler, M.A., Kuech, T.F., Appl.Phys.Lett., 58(15), 1617, (1991).Google Scholar
5. Allevato, C., Selders, J., Schulte, J. and Beneking, H., Solid State Electronics, 30, 1039 (1987).Google Scholar
6. Reeves, G.K. and Harrison, H.B., IEEE Electron Device Letters, EDL–3, 111 (1982).Google Scholar
7. Zheng, L., J.Appl.Phys., 71, 3566 (1992).Google Scholar
8. Vandenberg, J., Temkin, H., Hamm, R. and Diguiseppe, M., Thin Sol. Films, 104, 419 (1983).Google Scholar
9. Bruce, R., Clarke, D. and Eicher, S., Journal of Electronic Materials, 19, 225 (1990).Google Scholar