Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T01:36:19.529Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Surfactant Modification on the Sorption Behavior of Natural Zeolites for Strontium(2+) and Uranium(6+)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

James D. Prikry ,
F. Paul Bertetti  and
Roberto T. Pabalan
James D. Prikry
Affiliation:
Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses, Southwest Research Institute 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, TX 78238-5166jprikryl@swri.edu
F. Paul Bertetti
Affiliation:
Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses, Southwest Research Institute 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, TX 78238-5166pbertetti@swri.edu
Roberto T. Pabalan
Affiliation:
Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses, Southwest Research Institute 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, TX 78238-5166rpabalan@swri.edu
Get access

Abstract

Natural zeolite minerals have strong ion exchange selectivity for alkali and alkaline earth radionuclides, such as strontium and cesium, but only limited sorption affinity for actinides such as uranium. In a previous study, surfactant-modification of the zeolite surface was shown to enhance uranium(6+) sorption at solution pHs greater than about 6. In this study, experiments were conducted to evaluate the ability of surfactant-modified zeolite (SMZ) to sorb both strontium(2+) and uranium(6+). A surfactant-modified zeolite was prepared by treating specimens composed mainly of clinoptilolite with the cationic surfactant hexadecyltrimethylammonium-bromide (HDTMA). The surfactant-modified clinoptilolite was reacted with strontium solutions having a range of strontium concentration, and with a mixed solution of strontium and uranium. Experiments were conducted as a function of pH and in equilibrium with atmospheric CO2 (g). Surfactant-modification of clinoptilolite decreases the ion exchange selectivity of clinoptilolite for strontium at acidic to near-neutral pH. Strontium exchange data were compared to previously developed model predictions of strontium ion exchange behavior on clinoptilolite. The presence of both uranium and strontium in solution had little effect on either the ion exchange selectivity of the surfactant-modified clinoptilolite for strontium or on the enhanced sorption of uranium by SMZ at pH greater than 6.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 608: Symposium QQ – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXIII , 1999 , 281
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Haggerty, G.M. and Bowman, R.S., Environ. Sci. Technol. 28, p. 452–458 (1994).Google Scholar
2 Robinson, S., Kent, T., and Arnold, W., in Natural Zeolites '93: Occurrence, Properties, Use, edited by Ming, D. and Mumpton, F. (International Committee on Natural Zeolites, Brockport, NY 1995), p. 579.Google Scholar
3 Leppert, D., Geology 50, p. 140 (1988).Google Scholar
4 Valcke, E., Engels, B., and Cremers, A., Zeolites 18, p. 205 (1997).Google Scholar
5 Pabalan, R.T., Turner, D.R., Bertetti, F.P., and Prikryl, J.D., in Adsorption of Metals by Geomedia, edited by Jenne, E. (Academic Press, San Diego, CA 1998), p. 99–130.Google Scholar
6 Bertetti, F.P., Pabalan, R.T., and Almendarez, M., in Adsorption of Metals by Geomedia, edited by Jenne, E. (Academic Press, San Diego, CA 1998), p. 131–148.Google Scholar
7 Sullivan, E.J., Hunter, D.B., and Bowman, R.S., Environ. Sci. Technol. 32, p. 1948 (1998)Google Scholar
8 Neel, D. and Bowman, R., in Proc. 36th Annual New Mexico Water Conf., 7-8 November 1991, Las Cruces, NM 1992, p. 57.Google Scholar
9 Flynn, M., Sorption of Chromate and Lead onto Surface-Modified Zeolites. New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Masters Thesis, 1994.Google Scholar
10 Bowman, R., Haggerty, G., Huddleston, R., Neel, D., and Flynn, M. in Surfactant-enhancedRemediation of Subsurface Contamination, edited by Sabatini, D., Knox, R., and Harwell, J. (ACS Symposium Series 594, Washington, D.C. 1995), p. 54.Google Scholar
11 Prikryl, J.D. and Pabalan, R.T. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXII, edited by Wronkiewicz, D. and Lee, J. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 556, Warrendale, PA 1999), p. 1035–1042.Google Scholar
12 Li, Z. and Bowman, R.S., Environ. Sci. Technol. 31, p. 31–2407 (2412).Google Scholar
13 Pabalan, R.T., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 58, p. 4573 (1994).Google Scholar
14 Ming, D.W. and Dixon, J.B., Clays Clay Min. 35, p. 463–468 (1987).Google Scholar
15 Sullivan, E.J., Carey, J.W., and Bowman, R.S., J Colloid Interface Sci. 206, p. 369–380 (1998).Google Scholar
16 Li, Z., Langmuir 15, p. 6438–6445 (1999).Google Scholar
17 Pabalan, R.T. and Bertetti, F.P., J. Soln. Chem. 28, p. 367–393 (1999).Google Scholar