Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T12:02:43.991Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Surface Treatment on Light Emission from Porous Silicon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Babar A. Khan
Affiliation:
Philips Laboratories, Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510
Ronald Pinker
Affiliation:
Philips Laboratories, Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510
Khalid Shahzad
Affiliation:
Philips Laboratories, Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510
Barbara Rossi
Affiliation:
Philips Laboratories, Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510
Get access

Abstract

Visible light emission from porous silicon has recently been demonstrated by several groups. We have found that annealing of porous silicon samples in an inert atmosphere over 250C reduces the emission intensity, almost fully quenching it by 450C. We believe that this is due to the removal of passivating hydrogen, based on measurements of infrared absorption due to Si-H vibrational modes. We have also found that we can partially recover the emission intensity in these annealed porous silicon layers by passivation in a hydrogen plasma. We have therefore demonstrated that hydrogen passivation is necessary for the observation of visible emission from porous silicon. We have also shown that thermal oxidation of porous silicon over 200C reduces the PL emission. We propose that this reduction is also due to the loss of hydrogen passivation during the oxidation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Canham, L.T., APL, 57 (10), 3 Sep. 1990, pp10461048.Google Scholar
2. Halimaoui, A., Oules, C. and Bomchil, D., APL, 59 (3), 15 July 1991, 301306.Google Scholar
3. Unagami, T., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Vol.19, No.2, Feb. 1980, pp 231241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Baumgart, H., Frye, R.C., Trimble, L.E., Leamy, H.J. and Celler, G.K., “Laser and e-beam interaction with solids”, (1982), pg.609, North Holland.Google Scholar
5. Bomchil, G., Herino, R. and Barla, K., “Energy Beam-Solid Interactions and Transient Thermal Processing”, (1985), pp. 463–474.Google Scholar
6. Lehmann, V. and Gosele, U., APL, 58 (8), 25 Feb. 1991, pp. 856858.Google Scholar
7. Kato, Y., Ito, T. and Hiraki, A., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 27, L1406 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Yablanovitch, K., Allara, D.L., Chang, C.C., Gmitter, T. and Bright, T.B., Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 249 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Pandya, R. and Khan, B., JAP, Vol.62, No.8, 15 Oct.1987, pp. 32443248.Google Scholar
10. Khan, Babar A. and Pandya, Ranjana, MRS Symp. Proc., Vol.106, Fall Mtg. 1987, pp. 353358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Babar, A. Khan and Ranjana, Pandya, IEEE Tr. on ED, Vol.37, No.7, July 1990, 17271734.Google Scholar
12. Gates, Stephen M., Kunz, Roderick R. and Greenlief, Michael C., Surface Science 207, (1989), pp. 364384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Beckmann, K.H., Surface Science 3 (1965) 314332, North Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Unagami, T. and Imai, K., Jpn. Ann. Rev. in Electronics Computers and Telecommunications, Vol.8, Semiconductor Technologies, 1983, Editor J., Nishizawa, pp. 139–154.Google Scholar
15. Unagami, T., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Vol.19, No.2, Feb. 1980, pp. 231241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar