Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T22:05:01.598Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effects of Processing on the Microstructure of Copper Thin Films on Tantalum Barrier Layers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

E.M. Zielinski
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
R.P. Vinci
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
J.C. Bravman
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
Get access

Abstract

Preferred crystallographic orientation and grain size distribution were characterized as a function of processing for sputtered Cu films on Ta underlayers. The Ta barrier layer was deposited at two temperatures, 30 and 100 °C. Cu was deposited at 30, 150 and 250 °C on the 30 °C Ta, and at 100, 150, 200 and 250 °C on the 100 °C Ta. In the first set of samples, with increasing deposition temperature, the Cu (111) fiber texture grew weaker and the volume fraction of randomly oriented grains increased from 0.23 to 0.74. In contrast, for the films deposited on the 100 °C Ta, with increasing deposition temperature, Cu (111) fiber texture strengthened and the fractions of randomly oriented and twinned grains decreased. Grain size was lognormally distributed in all samples and varied approximately parabolically with deposition temperature. At a given deposition temperature, median grain size in the Cu was larger in the films deposited on the 100 °C Ta. These results will be related to the microstructure of the Ta underlayers. Cu microstructure on the 100 °C Ta is shown to be influenced by textural inheritance from the Ta underlayer. Microstructure of the Cu on 30 °C Ta is discussed in terms of trace contaminants.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Pai, P.-L. and Ting, C.H., VMIC Conf. Proc. 6, 258 (1989).Google Scholar
2 Tao, J., Cheung, N.W. and Hu, C., IEEE El. Dev. Lett. 14, 249 (1993).Google Scholar
3 Stolt, L., Charai, A., D'Heurle, F.M., Fryer, P.M. and Harper, J.M.E., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. A 9, 1501 (1991).Google Scholar
4 Holloway, K. and Fryer, P.M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 57, 1736 (1990).Google Scholar
5 Hu, C.-K., Chang, S., Small, M.B. and Lewis, J.E., VMIC Conf. Proc. 3, 181 (1986).Google Scholar
6 Bojarczuk, N.A., Clevenger, L.A., Holloway, K., Harper, J.M.E., Cabral, C., Schad, R.G. and Stolt, L., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 203, 387 (1991).Google Scholar
7 Clevenger, L.A., Bojarczuk, N.A., Holloway, K., Harper, J.M.E., Cabral, C. Jr., Schad, R.G., Cardone, F. and Stolt, L., J. Appl. Phys. 73, 300 (1993).Google Scholar
8 Vaidya, S. and Sinha, A.K., Thin Sol. Films 75, 253 (1981).Google Scholar
9 Tracy, D.P., Knorr, D.B. and Rodbell, K.P., J. Appl. Phys. 76, 2671 (1994).Google Scholar
10 Vinci, R.P. and Bravman, J.C., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 308, 337 (1993).Google Scholar
11 Tracy, D.P. and Knorr, D.B., J. Elect. Mat. 22, 611 (1993).Google Scholar
12 Zielinski, E.M., Vinci, R.P. and Bravman, J.C., J. Appl. Phys. 76, 4516 (1994).Google Scholar
13 Knorr, D.B., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 309, 75 (1993).Google Scholar
14 Kaelble, E.F., Handbook of X-rays. (McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1967).Google Scholar
15 Moseley, P.T. and Seabrook, C.J., Acta Crystallogr. B 29, 1170 (1973).Google Scholar
16 Catania, P., Doyle, J.P. and Cuomo, J.J., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. A 10, 3318 (1992).Google Scholar
17 Thompson, C.V., Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 20, 245 (1990).Google Scholar
18 Verkerk, M.J., van der Kolk, G.J. and Brankaert, W.A.M.C., Semicon. Int. 11, 106 (1988s).Google Scholar
19 van der Kolk, G.J., Verkerk, M.J. and Brankaert, W.A.M.C., Semicon. Int. 11, 224 (1988).Google Scholar
20 Frear, D.R., Campbell, A.N., Draper, B.L. and Mikawa, R.E., J. Elect. Mat. 18, 517 (1989).Google Scholar