Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T05:02:38.697Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of H+-Implantation On Electron Traps In N-Type Si Induced by P+ Pre-Implantation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Akira Ito
Affiliation:
Department of Electronic and Information Engineering, Suzuka College of Technology, Shiroko, Suzuka 510–02, Japan, aito@info.suzuka-ct.ac.jp
Hiroyuki Iwata
Affiliation:
Research Institute for Industrial Technology, Aichi Institute of Technology, Yakusa, Toyota 470–03, Japan
Yutaka Tokuda
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics, Aichi Institute of Technology, Yakusa, Toyota 470–03, Japan
Get access

Abstract

The change of the concentration of electron traps in n-type Si induced by P+ implantation (300keV, l×109 cm−2) with subsequent H+-implantation has been studied by deep level transient spectroscopy. H+-implantation is performed at room temperature to a dose of 2×1010cm−2 in the range 30 to 120keV. First P+ implantation induces six electron traps (Ec-0.12, 0.15, 0.21, 0.26, 0.39, 0.49eV). H+-implantation additionally induces an electron trap (Ec-0.32eV) which is related to hydrogen. The subsequent H+-implantation partly decreases the concentration of the electron traps induced by P+ implantation, although it increases the concentrations near the H+ projected range. 30 keV H+-implantation is mdst effective to reduce the trap concentration. The reduction of the concentration of the traps is ascribed to the reaction of pre-existing defects with interstitial or vacancy defects formed by subsequent H+-implantation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1) Kimerling, L.C., IEEE Trans. On Nuclear Sci. NS–23, 1497 (1976).Google Scholar
2) Elliman, R.G., Williams, J.S., Brown, W.L., Leiberich, A., Maher, D.M. and Knoell, R.V., Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B19/20, 435 (1987).Google Scholar
3) Linnors, J. and Holmdn, G., J.Appl.Phys. 62, 4737 (1987)Google Scholar
4) Nakata, J., Phys.Rev. B 43,14643 (1991)Google Scholar
5) Tokuda, Y., Hasebe, Y., Ito, A., Iwata, H., Usami, A., Terashima, A., Ohshima, H. and Hattori, T, to be published in Semiconductor Science and TechnologyGoogle Scholar
6) Lang, D.V., J.Appl.Phys. 45, 3023 (1974)Google Scholar
7) Tokuda, Y., Shimizu, N. and Usami, A., Jpn.J.Appl.Phys. 18, 309 (1979)Google Scholar
8) Svensson, B.G., Halldn, A. and Rsundqvist, B.U., Mat.Sci.and Eng. B4, 285 (1989)Google Scholar
9) Qin, G.G., Du, Y.C., Wu, J., and Yao, X.C. in Defects in Semiconductors edited by Bardeleben, H.J.von (Mat.Sci.Forum 10–12, 1986) pp. 563572 Google Scholar
10) Palmetshofer, L. and Reisinger, J., J.Appl.Phys. 72, 2167 (1992)Google Scholar
11) Asom, M.T., Benton, J.L., Sauer, R. and Kimerling, L.C., Appl.Phys.Lett. 51, 256 (1987)Google Scholar
12) Kouketsu, M., Watanabe, K. and Isomae, S., Materials Science Forum 196–201, 861 (1995)Google Scholar