Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T13:27:45.931Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Glass and Carbon Fiber on Nylon 6,6 Crystallization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Krisda Siangchaew
Affiliation:
Stevens Institute of Technology, Castle Point on the Hudson, Hoboken, N.J. 07030 Department of Materials Science and Engineering
Theodore Davidson
Affiliation:
Stevens Institute of Technology, Castle Point on the Hudson, Hoboken, N.J. 07030 Polymer Processing Institute (PPI)andDesign and Manufacturing Institute (DMI)
Matthew Libera
Affiliation:
Stevens Institute of Technology, Castle Point on the Hudson, Hoboken, N.J. 07030 Polymer Processing Institute (PPI)andDesign and Manufacturing Institute (DMI)
Get access

Abstract

The effects of addition of glass fiber and HMS4 carbon fiber on the crystallization of nylon 6,6 has been investigated using DSC and polarized optical Microscopy (POM). DSC observations indicate that HMS4 fiber lowers the supercooling required to initiate crystallization. A transcrystalline layer is also observed in the near-fiber region of carbon fiber-reinforced composites after DSC. The presence of transcrystallinity and the earlier onset of crystallization for this composite are due to heterogeneous nucleation on carbon fiber surfaces. DSC Measurements of nylon 6,6 with glass fibers show supercoolings similar to those of neat nylon 6,6. Transcrystallinity is also absent in the glass-reinforced composites. These glass fibers appear to be weak nucleation catalysts. Different transcrystalline layer thickness is found to be influenced by thermal processing condition. In addition to transcrystallinity, the HMS4 carbon fiber also influences the bulk morphology of the nylon 6,6.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Bassett, D. C., Principles of Polymer Morphology. (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1981).Google Scholar
2. Chatterjee, A. M. and Price, F. P., J. Polym. Sci., 13, 2369 (1975).Google Scholar
3. Fitchmun, D. R. and Newman, S., J. Polym. Sci., A–2, 1545 (1970).Google Scholar
4. Incardona, S., Migliaresi, C., Wagner, H. D., Gilbert, A. H., and Marom, G., Composites Science and Technology, 47, 43 (1993).Google Scholar
5. Lustiger, A., Uralii, F. S., and Newaz, G. M., Polymer Composites, 11, 65 (1990).Google Scholar
6. Gray, A. P., Thermochim. Acta, 1, 563 (1970).Google Scholar
7. Lee, Y. and Porter, R. S., Polymer Eng. and Sci., 26, 633 (1986).Google Scholar
8. Hsiao, B. S. and Chen, E. J. H., Interfaces in Composites, edited by Pantano, C. G. and Chen, E. J. H. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 170, 1990) pp. 117.Google Scholar
9. Chen, E. J. H. and Hsiao, B. S., Polym. Eng. and Sci., 32, 280 (1992).Google Scholar
10. McLaren, J. V., Polymer 3, 175 (1963).Google Scholar