Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T14:00:34.880Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effects of Conjugation Length and Substituents on the Conductivity of Oxidatively Doped p,p’-Disubstituted Diphenylpolyenes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Linda S. Sapochak ,
David W. Polis ,
Art N. Bain ,
Paul Bryson ,
Larry R. Dalton  and
C. W. Spangler
Larry R. Dalton
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089–0482.
C. W. Spangler
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois, 60115.
Get access

Abstract

It has been demonstrated that the oxidative doping of a.oo-diphenylpolyenes generates polaronic and/or bipolaronic intermediates which can be directly observed by optical spectroscopy. Furthermore, the absorption frequencies have been shown to correlate with conjugation length and the nature of the substituents. Species are stabilized by donor substituents and destabilized by acceptor substituents. We now report conductivity and ESR studies on iodine doped α,ω-diphenylpolyenes, containing donor p,p’-disubstituents. The implications of these studies can provide insight into electrical conductivity and optical nonlinearity of doped organic materials.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 173: Symposium Q – Advanced Organic Solid State Materials , 1989 , 443
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Heeger, AJ., Orenstein, A.J., and Ulrich, D.R., Nonlinear Optical Properties of Polymers, Part II (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1988).Google Scholar
2. Shirakawa, H., Louis, E.F., MacDiarmid, AG., Chiang, C.K., and Heeger, AJ., J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 578, (1977).Google Scholar
3. Spangler, C.W., Nickel, E., and Hall, T.J., Polymer Preprints., 28, 543 (1987).Google Scholar
4. Spangler, C.W., Sapochak, L, and Gates, B., in Organic Materials for Nonlinear Optics, edited by Hann, R. and Bloor, D. (Royal Society of Chemistry, Oxford, 1989), p. 57.Google Scholar
5. Spangler, CW., Bryson, P., and Dalton, LR., to be published.Google Scholar
6. Spangler, CW. and Havelka, K., to be presented at the 1990 ACS Spring Meeting, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
7. Spangler, CW., McCoy, R., Dembek, A., Sapochak, L, and Gates, B., J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 151 (1989).Google Scholar
8. Uhlir, A. Jr., The Bell System Technical Journal, 105 (1955).Google Scholar
9. Smits, F.M., The Bell System Technical Journal, 711 (1958).Google Scholar
10. Morrison, and Boyd, , Organic Chemistry, 3rd ed., (Allyn and Bacon, Inc., Boston, 1977), p. 730.Google Scholar
11. Hall, T.J., Bachrach, S.M., Spangler, CW., Sapochak, L.S., Lin, C.T., Guan, H. W., and Rogers, R.D., Acta Cryst. C45, 1541 (1989).Google Scholar