Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T17:54:30.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Texture on Hillock Formation in Aluminum Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

T. Muppidi
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University Pullman, WA 99164-2920 USA
Y. Kusama
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University Pullman, WA 99164-2920 USA
D.P. Field
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University Pullman, WA 99164-2920 USA
Get access

Abstract

Stress voiding describes a phenomenon in thin interconnect lines where hillocks and voids are formed during thermal cycling due to the stresses caused by the difference in the thermal expansion coefficients of metal used in the interconnect lines and the substrate material. The effect of texture on stress voiding in aluminum interconnects is investigated using orientation imaging microscopy (OIM© ) and scanning electron microscopy. Aluminum films were deposited by PVD deposition onto sublayers of Ti and Ti plus TiN and were analyzed for crystallographic texture and grain boundary structure using OIM©. These films were later annealed at 400°C for 1 hour and cooled. The specimens were examined for the presence of hillocks and voids using a scanning electron microscope. The results show strongly textured (111) films are more resistant to hillock and void formation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Klema, J., Pyle, R. and Domangue, E., in Proc. 22 nd Annu. Int. Reliability symp, (IEEE, New York, 1984) p 1.Google Scholar
2. Curry, J., Fitzgibbon, G., Guan, Y.. Muelle, R., Nelson, G. and Thomas, A., in Proc. 22 nd Annu. Int. Reliability symp, (IEEE, New York, 1984) p 6.Google Scholar
3. Kim, Deok-kee, Nix, William D., Deal, Michael D., and Plummer, James D., J. Mater. Res., 15, 1709 (2000).Google Scholar
4. Martin, B Cao, Tracy, C J, Mayer, J W, Hendrickson, L E, Thin Solid Films 271, 64, (1995).Google Scholar
5. Kylnera, C., Mattsson, L, . Mater. Res., 14, 4087 (1999).Google Scholar
6. Nowell, Matthew M and Field, David P., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 516, 115, (1998).Google Scholar
7. Sanchez, J. E. Jr and Arzt, E., Scr. Metall. Mater. 27, 285 (1992).Google Scholar
8. Schwarzer, R. A. and Gerth, D., J. Electron. Mater. 22, 607 (1993).Google Scholar
9. Kima, Deok-kee, Nix, William D., Vinci, Richard P., Deal, M D. and Plummer, J D., J. Appl. Phys, 90, 781 (2001).Google Scholar
10. Nucci, J.A., Shachan-Diamand, Y., Sanchez, J.E., J. Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 26 (1995).Google Scholar
11. Matthies, S., and Vinel, G.W., Materials Science Forum (Proc. ICOTOM- 10), 157, 1641 (1994)Google Scholar