Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-7nlkj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T14:24:14.360Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Temperature and Pressure on Residual Stress in LPCVD Polysilicon Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

D-G. Oei  and
S. L. McCarthy
D-G. Oei
Affiliation:
Scientific Research Laboratory, Ford Motor Company, Room E 1170, Box 2053, Dearborn, MI 48121-2053
S. L. McCarthy
Affiliation:
Scientific Research Laboratory, Ford Motor Company, Room E 1170, Box 2053, Dearborn, MI 48121-2053
Get access

Abstract

Measurements of the residual stress in polysilicon films made by Low Pressure Chemical Vapor Deposition (LPCVD) at different deposition pressures and temperatures are reported. The stress behavior of phosphorus (P)-ion implanted/annealed polysilicon films is also reported. Within the temperature range of deposition, 580 °C to 650 °C, the stress vs deposition temperature plot exhibits a transition region in which the stress of the film changes from highly compressive to highly tensile and back to highly compressive as the deposition temperature increases. This behavior was observed in films that were made by the LPCVD process at reduced pressures of 210 and 320 mTORR. At deposition temperatures below 590 °C the deposit is predominantly amorphous, and the film is highly compressive; at temperatures above 610 °C (110) oriented polycrystalline silicon is formed exhibiting high compressive residual stress.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 276: Symposia U/Y – Smart Materials Fabrication and Materials for Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems , 1992 , 85
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Petersen, K.E., IEEE:IEDM Tech.Dig. 2 (1985).Google Scholar
2. Mehregany, M., Gabriel, K.J., Trimmer, W.S., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, ED 35(6), 719 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Howe, R.T., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp., Proc. 106, 213 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Krulevitch, P., Howe, R.T., Johnson, G.C., Huang, J., IEEE, Digest of Technical Papers, Transducers ‘91, San Francisco, CA, 949 (1991).Google Scholar
5. Muraka, S.P., Retajczyk, T.F., Jr., J. Appl. Phys. 54, 2069 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Guckel, H. et al., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 35(6), 800 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Adamczewska, J., Budzynski, T., Thin Solid Films 113, 271 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Kamins, T.I., Sens. and Act. A21–A23, 817 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Bloem, J., Claassen, W.A.P., Philips Tech. Rev. 41(2), 60 (1983/84).Google Scholar
10. Bisaro, R., Magarino, J., Proust, N., Zellama, K., J. Appl. Phys. 59, 1167 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Choi, M.S., Hearn, E.W., J. Electrochem. Soc. 131, 2443 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Orpana, M., Korhonen, A.O., IEEE, Digest of Technical Papers, Transducers ‘91, San Francisco, CA, 957 (1991).Google Scholar
13. Hangas, J., Liu, D.R., Oei, D-G., McCarthy, S.L., and Peters, C.R., presented at the 1991 MRS Fall Meeting, Boston, MA 1991 (unpublished).Google Scholar