Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T01:33:11.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effect of Spin Dependent Scattering from Impurities on Giant Magnetoresistance and Thermal Conductivity in Fe/Cr Multilayers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

B.L. Johnson
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309-0390
R.E. Camley
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80933-7150
Get access

Abstract

Recent experiments have tested the assumption that a spin-dependent asymmetry in scattering is responsible for the giant magnetoresistance (GMR) in Fe/Cr multilayers by introducing additional impurities (with different spin-dependent scattering asymmetries) at the interfaces. This paper presents a theoretical calculation based on a Boltzmann transport equation approach which is appropriate for these new experiments. We find that when impurities (Mn, V) are introduced which have a spin-dependent scattering asymmetry similar to that of Cr in Fe the GMR is not substantially changed. When impurities (Al, Ir) with a spin-dependent scattering asymmetry opposite to that of Cr in Fe are introduced there is a rapid degredation of the GMR. Our results are compared with experiment and good agreement is found provided that the magnitude of the scattering asymmetry in Al is reduced somewhat from low-temperature published values. It is argued that thermal effects could indeed provide such a reduction. We also point out that the thermal conductivity should undergo changes with magnetic field in these structures, since the thermal conductivity also depends upon electron mobility.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Baibich, M.N., Broto, J.M., Fert, A., Dau, F. Nguyen Van, Petroff, F., Eitenne, P., Creuzet, G., Friederich, A., and Chazelas, J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2472 (1988)Google Scholar
2. Binasch, G., Grunberg, P., Suarenbach, F., and Zinn, W., Phys. Rev. B 39, 4828 (1989) and J. Krebs, P. Lubitz, A. Chaiken, G.A. Prinz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1645 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Camley, R.E. and Barnas, J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 664 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Barnas, J., Fuss, A., Camley, R.E., Grunberg, P., and Zinn, W., Phys. Rev. B 42, 8110 (1990)Google Scholar
5. Levy, P.M., Zhang, S., and Fert, A., Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1643 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Baumgart, P., Gurney, B., Wilhoit, D., Nguyen, T., Dieny, B., Speriosu, V., presented at MIMM 1990 (BC-08), to appear in J. of Appl. Phys.Google Scholar
7. Campbell, I.A. and Fert, A. in Ferromagnetic Materials, ed. by Wohlfarth, E.P., North Holland (1982), Vol. 3, p. 747 Google Scholar
8. Parkin, S.S.P., More, N., Roche, K.P, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2304 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Wang, Y., Levy, P.M., Fry, J.L., Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2732 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar