Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T12:02:30.967Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effect of Solution Ph and Ion Concentrations on Leaching of Silicate Glass*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Bruce C. Bunker
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
George W. Arnold
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
Get access

Extract

For complex glasses such as simulated nuclear wastes, glass dissolution is a complex process, involving selective leaching of cations, reprecipitation reactions, and protective film formation. In order to begin to understand this complex behavior, each of the above phenomena is being studied, one reaction at a time, on simple alkali silicate glasses under controlled environmental conditions. To date, two types of reactions have been investigated. The first reaction type is the selective leaching of cations from the glass, resulting in the formation of a hydrated “gel” layer on the glass surface. The second reaction type is the reaction of ionic or colloidal species in solution with this gel layer. Reactions in the second category include ion exchange reactions and sorption reactions which can result in protective film formation. Studies of these simple reactions have led to the development of new leaching models and to observations which begin to explain the behavior of complex glasses, and predict how glass dissolution should change as a function of the chemical environment.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

A U. S. DOE facility.

*

This work supported by the U. S. Department of Energy under contract number DE-AC04-76DP00789.

References

REFERENCES

1. Douglas, R. W. and El-Shamy, T. M. M., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 50, 1 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Houser, C. A., Herman, J. S., Tsong, I. S. T., and White, W. B., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 41, 89 (1980).Google Scholar
3. Godbee, H. W., Compere, E. L., Joy, D. S., Kibbey, A. H., Moore, J. G., and Nestor, C. W. Jr., Nuclear and Chemical Waste Management, 1, 29 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Fleming, J. W. Jr. and Day, D. E., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 55, 186 (1972).Google Scholar
5. Baes, C. F. Jr. and Mesmer, R. E., The Hydrolysis of Cations, John Wiley and Sons, New York (1976).Google Scholar
6. Schindler, P. W., Fürst, B., Dick, R., and Wolf, P. U., J. Colloid Interface Sci., 55, 469 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Wiese, G. R. and Healy, T. W., J. Colloid Interface Sci., 52, 458 (1975).Google Scholar
8. Parks, G. A., Chem. Rev., 65, 177 (1965).Google Scholar
9. Furlong, D. N., Freemen, P. A., and Lau, A. C. M., J. Colloid Interface Sci., 80, 20 (1981).Google Scholar
10. Buckwalter, C. Q. and Pederson, L. R., “Inhibition of Nuclear Waste Glass Leaching by Chemisorption,” accepted by J. Am. Ceram. Soc.Google Scholar
11. McVay, G. L. and Buckwalter, C. Q., “The Effect of Iron on Waste Glass Leaching,” submitted to J. Am. Ceram. Soc.Google Scholar