Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T22:34:10.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Particle Size on the Luminescent Properties of Europium Doped Yttrium Oxide Nano-Phosphors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

Thomas S. Copeland
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science & Engineering, Clemson Univ. Clemson, SC 29634, USA
Burtrand I. Lee
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science & Engineering, Clemson Univ. Clemson, SC 29634, USA
Amanda K. Elrod
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science & Engineering, Clemson Univ. Clemson, SC 29634, USA
Get access

Abstract

Red light emitting Eu3+ doped Y2O3 phosphor nano-particles were synthesized by a solgel method combined with a furnace firing. The particle size, measured using dynamic light scattering (DLS), was between36nm and 1 micron depending on the conditions. Final dopant concentrations were measured through inductively coupled plasma (ICP). The ICP results show a dopant loss of 58% during the processing for the europium doped yttria. Red photoluminescence (PL) and cathodoluminescence (CL), at 614nm was observed from the phosphor particles under UV excitation and electron bombardment. Results show that the samples with a mean diameter of 30nm displayed a significant increase in PL brightness over the samples whose mean diameter was 215nm. The lag in PL, and CL intensity behind the commercial reference samples is attributed to the significantly lower dopant levels present in the experimental phosphors. Results also indicate that these processing methods and nanophosphors may be a useful alternative to current materials and methods.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Yoo, J.S., Lee, J.D., J. Appl. Phys. 81, 6 (1997).Google Scholar
2. Zhang, W., Xie, P., Duan, C., Yan, K., Yin, M., Lou, L., Xia, S., Krupa, J.C., Chem. Phys. Letters, 292, 133136 (1998).Google Scholar
3. Purcell, E.M., Phys. Rev., 69, 681 (1946).Google Scholar
4. Painter, O., Lee, R.K., Scherer, A., Yariv, A., O'Brien, J.D., Dapkus, P.D., Kim, I., Science, 284, 11 June, 1999.Google Scholar
5. Gerard, J.M., Gayral, B., Phys. Rev. Lett. 73 1110 (1998).Google Scholar
6. Gerard, J.M., Gayral, B., Confined Photon Systems: Fundamentals and Applications, (Springer, Berlin, 1999).Google Scholar
7. Dijken, A.V., Makkinje, J., Meijerink, A., J. Lumin. 92, 323328 (2001).Google Scholar
8. Lee, B.I., Copeland, T.S., Elrod, A.K., and Qi, J., “Synthesis of Nano-sized European doped Yttrium Oxide”, Presented at MRS Fall Meeting 2001, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
9. Copeland, T.S., Lee, B.I., Elrod, A.K., and Qi, J., “Synthesis and Properties of Zn2SiO4:Mn2+ Nanophosphor,” J. Lumin. 97, 168 (2002).Google Scholar
10. Ozawa, L., Cathodoluminescence Theory and Applications, (Kodansha Ltd., Tokyo, Japan, 1990).Google Scholar