Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T03:34:38.036Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effect of Oxygen on Adhesion of Thin Copper Films to Silicon Nitride

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Mengzhi Pang
Affiliation:
Cornell University, Department of Materials Science and Engineering Ithaca, NY 14853, U.S.A.
Monika Backhaus-Ricoult
Affiliation:
Cornell University, Department of Materials Science and Engineering Ithaca, NY 14853, U.S.A.
Shefford P. Baker
Affiliation:
Cornell University, Department of Materials Science and Engineering Ithaca, NY 14853, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

The effect of oxygen on adhesion and chemistry at interfaces between Cu thin films and SiNx barrier layers on Si substrates was investigated. Films were deposited in an ultra-high-vacuum sputter deposition chamber with good control of oxygen content. Adhesion was measured using a high throughput driver film method. Microstructure and bonding were investigated using transmission electron microscopy and electron energy loss spectroscopy, respectively, on sample cross sections. For films to which a small amount of oxygen was added during deposition, oxygen segregated to Cu/SiNx interfaces during thermal cycling, where it induced charge transfer and the presence of Cu+ interfacial states, and significantly reduced the work of adhesion.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Keller, R.M., Baker, S.P., and Arzt, E., J. Mater. Res. 13, 1307 (1998).Google Scholar
2. Vinci, R.P., Zielinski, E.M., Bravman, J.C., Thin Solid Films 262, 142 (1995).Google Scholar
3. Shu, J. B., Clyburn, S. B., Mates, T. E., and Baker, S. P., J. Mater. Res. 18, 2122 (2003).Google Scholar
4. Baker, S.P., Keller-Flaig, R.M., and Shu, J. B., Acta Mater. 51, 3019 (2003).Google Scholar
5. Backhaus-Ricoult, M., Phil Mag. A 81, 1759 (2001).Google Scholar
6. Backhaus-Ricoult, M., Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 5, 2174 (2003).Google Scholar
7. Backhaus-Ricoult, M. and Trichet, M.-F, Zeitschrift f. Metallkunde, 94, 250 (2003).Google Scholar
8. Backhaus-Ricoult, M., Samet, L., Thomas, M., Trichet, M.-F. and Imhoff, D., Acta Mat. 50, 4191 (2002).Google Scholar
9. Backhaus-Ricoult, M. Annual Review of Materials Research, 33, 55 (2003).Google Scholar
10. Butrymowicz, D. B., Manning, J. R. and Read, M. E., J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 2, 643 (1973).Google Scholar
11. Pang, M., Wang, X. and Baker, S.P., unpublished, (2003).Google Scholar
12. Pang, M. and Baker, S.P., Materials, Technology and Reliability for Advanced Interconnects and Low-k Dielectrics, edited by McKerrow, Andrew J., Leu, Jihperng (Jim), Kraft, Oliver and Kikkawa, Takamaro (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. Pittsburgh, PA, 2003), E.2.8. Google Scholar
13. Baker, S.P., Wang, X. and Hui, C.–Y., Journal of Applied Mechanics, 69, 407 (2002).Google Scholar
14. Dauskardt, R.H., Lane, M., Ma, Q. and Krishna, N., Eng. Frac. Mech. 61, 141 (1998).Google Scholar
15. Pang, M. and Baker, S.P., unpublished, (2003).Google Scholar