Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T04:23:09.874Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Deposition Condition of Precursor Amorphous Silicon Thin Films on the Behavior of Milc

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

Y.-G. Yoon
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea, yygeon@eml.snu.ac.kr
G.-B. Kim
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea, yygeon@eml.snu.ac.kr
H.-H Park
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea, yygeon@eml.snu.ac.kr
S.-W Lee
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea, yygeon@eml.snu.ac.kr
S.-K. Joo
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea, yygeon@eml.snu.ac.kr
Get access

Abstract

We studied on the effect of a deposition condition of precursor a-Si thin films on the shape and micro-structure of MILC. The a-Si thin films were prepared by Plasma Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition (PECVD) with silane and hydrogen as a source gas and the deposition temperature was varied from 100 to 400∼. The a-Si films deposited at a lower temperature showed a tendency to (111) crystals and leaving some a-Si residues in MILC region, while those with higher deposition temperature tended to be crystallized to (110). These differences were explained in terms of original hydrogen content and following structural changes by the dehydrogenation during annealing.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Girginoudi, S., Girginoudi, D., and Thanailakis, A., J. Appl. Phys. 84(4) 1968 (1998)Google Scholar
2. Liu, G. and Fonash, S. J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 62 254 (1993)Google Scholar
3. Lee, S.-W., Lee, B.-I., Kim, T.-K., and Joo, S.-K., J. Appl. Phys. 85(10) 4180 (1999)Google Scholar
5. Kim, H.-S., Couillard, J. G. and Ast, D. G., Appl. Phys. Lett. 72(7) 803 (1998)Google Scholar
6. Lee, S.-W., Joo, S.-K., IEEE Electron Device Lett. 17(4) 160 (1996)Google Scholar
7. Wong, Man, Jin, Jhonghe, Bhat, Gururaj A., Wong, Philip C., and Kwok, Hoi Sing, IEEE Electron Devices, 47(5), 1061 (2000)Google Scholar
8. Makita, N., Sakamoto, H., Nakajima, S., Osame, M., and Yamazaki, S., AM-LCD proc., 37 (2000)Google Scholar
9. Tochitani, G., Shimozuma, M., and Tagashira, H., J. Appl. Phys. 72(1), 234 (1992)Google Scholar
10. Srinivasan, Easwar, Lloyd, Daniel A., and Parsons, Gregory N., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 15(1), 77 (1997)Google Scholar
11. Kim, H.-Y., Choi, J.-B., and Lee, J. -Y., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 17(6), 3240 (1999)Google Scholar