Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T00:29:51.158Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Coating Thickness on Interfacial Shear Behavior of Zirconia-Coated Sapphire Fibers in a Polycrystalline Alumina Matrix

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

John R. Hellmann
Affiliation:
Center for Advanced Materials, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
Yeong-Shyung Chou
Affiliation:
Center for Advanced Materials, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
Get access

Abstract

The effect of zirconia (ZrO2) interfacial coatings on the interfacial shear behavior in sapphire reinforced alumina was examined in this study. Zirconia coatings of thicknesses ranging from 0.15 to 1.45 μm were applied to single crystal sapphire (Saphikon) fibers using a particulate loaded sol dipping technique. After calcining at 1100°C in air, the coated fibers were incorporated into a polycrystalline alumina matrix via hot pressing. Interfacial shear strength and sliding behavior of the coated fibers was examined using thin-slice indentation fiber pushout and pushback techniques. In all cases, debonding and sliding occurred at the interface between the fibers and the coating. The coatings exhibited a dense microstructure and led to a higher interfacial shear strength (> 240 MPa) and interfacial sliding stress (>75 MPa) relative to previous studies on the effect of a porous interphase on interfacial properties [1]. The interfacial shear strength decreased with increasing fiber coating thickness (from 389 ± 59 to 241 ± 43 MPa for 0.15 to 1.45 μm thick coatings, respectively). Sliding behavior exhibited load modulation with increasing displacement during fiber sliding which is characteristic of fiber roughnessinduced “stick-slip”. No effect of fiber coating thickness on the interfacial sliding stress was observed for single pushout or pushback events. Heat treatment at 1550°C in air coarsened the fiber surface roughness, resulting in significantly higher interfacial shear strengths (>30%) and interfacial sliding stresses (>60%) relative to the coated fibers in an as-hot-pressed condition. Interfacial sliding resistance decreased significantly after the first sliding cycle. Evidence of substantial “stick-slip” behavior was eliminated from the load displacement plots after one pushout/pushback cycle; however, the pushback plots exhibited evidence of fiber reseating, followed by a decreasing trend in load with increasing displacement of the fiber back to the original position. These results directly support the interphase fragmentation scenario proposed for interface fatigue in ceramic composites.

The high interfacial shear strengths and sliding stresses measured in this study, as well as the potentially strength degrading surface reconstruction observed on the coated fibers after hot pressing and heat treatment, indicate that dense zirconia coatings are not suitable candidates for optimizing composite toughness and strength in the sapphire fiber reinforced alumina system.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Davis, J.B., Lofvander, J.A., Evans, A.G., Bischoff, E., and Emiliani, M.L., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 76, 1249 (1993).Google Scholar
2. Kerans, R.J. and Parthasarathy, T.A., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 74, 1586 (1991).Google Scholar
3. Marshall, D.B., Cox, B.N., and Evans, A.G., Acta Metall., 33, 2013 (1985).Google Scholar
4. Curtin, W.A., Eldridge, J.I., and Srinivasan, G.V., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 76, 2300 (1993).Google Scholar
5. Petrich, R.R., Koss, D.A., Hellmann, J.R., and Kallas, M.N., Scripta Metallurgica, 28, 1583 (1993).Google Scholar
6. Norkitis, M.E. and Hellmann, J.R., HITEMP Review 1991, NASA CP 10082, pp. 85: 1-14 (1991).Google Scholar
7. Jero, P.D., Kerans, R.J., and Parthasarathy, T.A., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 74, 2793 (1991).Google Scholar
8. Jaskowiak, M.H., Philipp, W.H., Eldridge, J.I., Setlock, J.A., Norkitis, M.E., and Hellmann, J.R., HITEMP Review 1992, NASA Conference Publication 10104, pp. 59.1 (1992).Google Scholar
9. Stough, Matthew A., Hellmann, John R., and Angelone, Mark S., HITEMP Review 1993, NASA Conference Publication 19117, pp. 80.1 (1993).Google Scholar
10. Kallas, M.N., Koss, D.A., Hahn, H.T., and Hellmann, J.R., J. Mater. Sci., 27, 3821 (1992).Google Scholar
11. Mackin, T.J., Yang, J., and Warren, P.D., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 75, 3358 (1992).Google Scholar
12. Carter, W.C., Butler, E.P., and Fuller, E.R. Jr., Scripta Metallurgica, 25, 579 (1991).Google Scholar
13. Roth, R.S., Dennis, J.R., and McMurdie, H.R., Phase Diagram for Ceramists, Vol. VI, The American Ceramic Society, Figure 6452 (1987).Google Scholar
14. Fischer, G.R., Manfredo, L.J., McNally, R.N., and Doman, R.C., J. Mater. Sci., 16, 1447 (1981).Google Scholar
15. Heuer, A.H., Claussen, N., Kriven, W.M., and Rühle, M., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 65, 642 (1982).Google Scholar
16. Koss, D.A., Petrich, R.R., Kallas, M.N., and Hellmann, J.R., Composites Science and Technology, 51, 27 (1993).Google Scholar
17. Koss, D.A., Hellmann, J.R., and Kallas, M.N., J. of Metals, 45, 34 (1993).Google Scholar
18. Stough, M.A., Hellmann, J.R., and Angelone, M.S., Proceedings of the Ceramic Matrix Composites Symposium, 96th Annual Meeting of the American Ceramic Society, Indianapolis, IN, April 24-28, 1994, in press.Google Scholar
19. Stough, M.A., Zirconia Coated Sapphire Fiber Surface Degradation, Master of Science Thesis, The Pennsylvania State University (1994) 119 pp.Google Scholar
20. Mackin, T.J., Warren, P.D., and Evans, A.G., Acta Metall. Mater., 40, 1251 (1992).Google Scholar