Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T01:51:34.134Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dynamics of Surface Segregation During InGaAs Mbe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Keith R. Evans
Affiliation:
Wright Laboratory, Solid State Electronics Directorate, WPAFB OH 45433
R. Kaspi
Affiliation:
Wright State University, University Research Center, Dayton, OH 45435
J.E. Ehret
Affiliation:
Wright Laboratory, Solid State Electronics Directorate, WPAFB OH 45433
M. Skowronski
Affiliation:
Carnegie Melon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
Get access

Abstract

The dynamics of In surface segregation during molecular beam epitaxy growth of In.22Ga.78As/GaAs quantum wells (QWs) are studied by temperature-programmed desorption (TPD). The TPD spectra show two In peaks: a low temperature (low-T5) peak and a high temperature (high-T5) peak, which arise from desorption of surface segregated In and dissociation of the underlying InGaAs lattice, respectively. Integration of the low-Ts peak provides quantitative determination of the surface segregated In population ΘIn, as a function of InGaAs layer thickness, incident arsenic dimer flux [(Fi(As2)], InGaAs growth temperature, and GaAs cap thickness. The surface segregated In population ΘIn, is observed to grow with InGaAs thickness, until reaching a temperature-dependent steady state value between 1.0 and 2.0 monolayers after approximately ten monolayers of growth, and then decays during GaAs overlayer growth. The variation of ΘIn with thickness closely mimics the resulting vertical composition profile, which is characterized by an In-depleted bottom interface and segregation of In into the GaAs cap. Based on these results, a sequence of: 1) In predeposition, 2) InGaAs growth, and 3) thermal desorption of Eh is proposed to produce a more square InGaAs/GaAs QW than can be obtained by more standard MBE approaches.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Moison, J. M., Guille, C., Houzay, F., Barthe, F. and Rompay, M. Van, Phys. Rev. B 40, 6149 (1989).Google Scholar
2. Nagle, J., Landesman, J. P., Larive, M., Mottet, C. and Bois, P., J. Cryst. Growth 127, 550 (1993).Google Scholar
3. Zheng, J. F., Walker, J. D., Salmeron, M. B. and Weber, E. R., Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2414 (1994).Google Scholar
4. Menzel, D., in Chemistry and Physics of Solid Surfaces, 4, 389406 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1982).Google Scholar
5. Evans, K. R., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 340, 13 (1994).Google Scholar
6. Kaspi, R. and Evans, K. R., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 280, 73 (1993).Google Scholar
7. Toyoshima, H., Niwa, T., Yamazaki, J., and Okamoto, A., J. Appl. Phys. 75, 3908 (1994).Google Scholar
8. Dehaese, O., Wallart, X., and Mollot, F., Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 52 (1995).Google Scholar
9. See, for example, Ivanov, S. V., Kop'ev, P. S. and Ledentsov, N. N., J. Cryst. Growth 111, 151 (1991).Google Scholar
10. Kaspi, R. and Evans, K. R., to be published.Google Scholar