Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T09:27:15.639Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dissolution Mechanisms of the Perovskite and Hollandite Phases in the Synroc Assemblage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

S. Nyhra
Affiliation:
Division of Science and Technology, Griffith University, Nathan, Qid. 4111, Australia
D.K. Pham
Affiliation:
Division of Science and Technology, Griffith University, Nathan, Qid. 4111, Australia
R.St.C. Smart
Affiliation:
School of Chemical Technology, South Australian Institute of Technology Ingle Farm, S.A. 5098, Australia
P.S. Turner
Affiliation:
Division of Science and Technology, Griffith University, Nathan, Qid. 4111, Australia
Get access

Abstract

Perovskite (CaTiO3 )and hollandite ([BaxCsy,][(Ti,Al) 3+ Ti4 + ]016) 2x+y 8-2x-y are two of the three major phases of the Synroc titanate mineral assemblage. The chemical durabilities of these two phases have been investigated by solution analysis, surface analysis and electron microscopy. While a detailed model of the durability of perovskite has evolved from previous work, much less is known about the mechanisms which affect the durability of hollandite. The present investigations show that, for single-phase hollandite, selective extraction by ion exchange of Cs+ and Ba 2+ does not play a significant role. On the other hand, total dissolution of the network does seem to occur as a result of base-catalysed hydrolysis. Also, complexation and precipitation of Al and TI species in solution has the effect of driving the system to low pH. These results can be correlated with the more complete model for dissolution of perovskite in order to infer the overall effects of aqueous attack on the Synroc HLW solid.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Ringwood, A.E., Safe Disposal of High Level Nuclear Reactor Waste: A New Strategy. ANU Press, Canberra (1978).Google Scholar
2. Oversby, V.M. and Ringwood, A.E., Radioactive Waste Manage., 2, 223 (1982).Google Scholar
3. Levins, D.M., Reeve, K.D., Buykx, W.J., Ryan, R.K., Seatonberry, B.W., Woolfrey, J.L., Spectrum '86. ANS Int. Topical Meeting on Waste Management, Decontamination and Decommissioning, Sept.. 14–18, 1986 Niagara Falls, USA. (1986).Google Scholar
4.Nuclear Waste Materials Handbook - Test Methods. Materia]s Characterization Center, Pacific Northwest Laboratory. DOE/TIC-11400, Rev 1 (1983).Google Scholar
5. Myhra, S., Smart, R.St.C., Turner, P.S., Scanning Microscopy, 2, 715 (1988).Google Scholar
6. Myhra, S., Savage, D., Atkinson, A., Riviere, J.C., Am. Mineral, 69, 902 (1984).Google Scholar
7. Pham, D.K., Neall, F.B., Myhra, S., Smart, R.St.C. and Turner, P.S., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Manage, XII), Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 127, 231 (MRS, 1989).Google Scholar
8. Kastrissios, T., Stephenson, M., Turner, P.S., White, T.J., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 70, C144 (1987).Google Scholar
9. Kesson, S.E. and White, T.J., Proc. R.Soc. Lond.A, 408, 295 (1986).Google Scholar
10. Kesson, S.E. and White, T.J., Proc. R.Soc. Lond.A, 405, 73 (1986).Google Scholar
11. Fielding, P.E. and White, T.J., J. Mater. Res.,. 2, 387 (1987).Google Scholar