Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T03:18:48.031Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Direct Observation by Transmission Electron Microscopy of the Early Stages of Growth of Superconducting Thin Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

M. Grant Norton
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.
Lisa A. Tietz
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.
Scott R. Summerfelt
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.
C. Barry Carter
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.
Get access

Abstract

The fabrication of high quality thin films often depends on the early stages of the growth process during which epitaxy is established. The substrate surface structure generally plays a critical role at this stage. Many observations of the high‐Tc superconductor film‐substrate interface structure and chemistry have been made by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of cross‐section samples. Ion‐milling induced damage, however, can be severe in these specimens. In the present study, the early stages of the growth of high Tc superconducting thin films of YBa2Cu3O have been studied by TEM using a technique which requires no post‐deposition specimen preparation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Inam, A., Hegde, M.S., Wu, X.D., Venkatesan, T., England, P., Miceli, P.F., Chase, E.W., Chang, C.C., Tarascon, J. M. and Wachtman, J.B., Appl. Phys. Lett., 52, 908 (1988)Google Scholar
2 Hwang, D.M., Venkatesan, T., Chang, C.C., Nazar, L., Wu, X.D., Inam, A. and Hegde, M.S., Appl. Phys. Lett., 54, 1702 (1989)Google Scholar
3 Moeckly, B.H., Lathrop, D.K., Redinbo, G.F., Russek, S.E. and Buhrman, R.A., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp., (1989) (these proceedings)Google Scholar
4 Girault, C., Damiani, D. J., Aubreton, and Catherinot, C., Appl. Phys. Lett., 54, 534 (1989)Google Scholar
5 Norton, M.G., Tietz, L.A., Summerfelt, S.R. and Carter, C.B., Appl. Phys. Lett, (accepted for publication)Google Scholar
6 Tietz, L.A., DeCooman, B.C., Carter, C.B., Lathrop, D.K., Russek, S.E. and Buhrman, R.A., J. Electron Microsc. Tech., 8, 263 (1988)Google Scholar
7 Russek, S.E., Moeckly, B.H., Buhrman, R.A., McWhirter, J.T., Sievers, A.J., Norton, M.G., Tietz, L.A. and Carter, C.B., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. (1989) (these proceedings)Google Scholar
8 Susnitzky, D.W. and Carter, C.B., J. Amer. Ceram. Soc., 69, C217 (1986)Google Scholar
9 Hirsch, P.B., Howie, A., Nicholson, R.B., Pashley, D.W. and Whelan, M.J., Electron Microscopy of Thin Crystals. 2nd. ed. (Robert Krieger Publishers, Florida, 1977), p. 357 Google Scholar
10 Norton, M.G., Tietz, L.A., Carter, C.B., Russek, S.E., Moeckly, B.H. and Buhrman, R.A., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. (1989) (these proceedings)Google Scholar