Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T16:01:57.544Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Direct Concentration Measurement of Hydrogen Electromigration Using Nuclear Reaction Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

R. E. Benenson ,
P. Berning  and
L. Wielunski
R. E. Benenson
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, SUNY at Albany, 1400 Washington Avenue, Albany, N.Y. 12222
P. Berning
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, SUNY at Albany, 1400 Washington Avenue, Albany, N.Y. 12222
L. Wielunski
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, SUNY at Albany, 1400 Washington Avenue, Albany, N.Y. 12222
Get access

Abstract

Lateral concentration profiles of hydrogen (1H) have been measured using nuclear recoil analysis on electrolytically charged metal (V, Nb, Ta) foils subjected to current densities of order 103 amps/cm2 for various times in order to study the electromigration of hydrogen. Initially uniformly loaded foils exhibited a dramatic redistribution of the hydrogen. Numerical analysis of these data using the conventional solution of the electromigration equation is used to extract the hydrogen effective charge (Z*) from the steady state data and the diffusion coefficient from the time-dependent data. The nuclear technique permits rapid and accurate direct concentration measurements capable of distinguishing surface and subsurface transport.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 40: Symposium J – Electronic Packaging Materials Science I , 1984 , 335
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Wipf, H., Chap. 7 in Hydrogen in Metals II, edited by Alefeld, G. and Volkl, J., Springer-Verlag Berlin 1978.Google Scholar
2. Einziger, R. and Huntington, H.B., J. Phys. Chem. Sol. 35, 1563 (1974).Google Scholar
3. Brauer, E., Doerr, R., Gruner, B. and Rauch, F., ‘preprint’.Google Scholar
4. Erchmann, V. and Wipf, H., Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 341 (1976).Google Scholar
5. Golopentia, D.A. and Huntington, H.B., J.Ph-ys.Chem.Solid, 39, 975 (1978).Google Scholar
6. de Groot, S.B., Physica 9 , 699 (1942).Google Scholar
7. Oriani, R.A. and Gonzales, O.D., Trans. AIME 239,1041 (1967).Google Scholar
8. Wielunski, L., Benenson, R.E. & Lanford, W.A., Nucl. Instr. Meth. in Phys. Res. 218, 120 (1983).Google Scholar
9. Lanford, W.A., Trautvetter, H.P., Ziegler, J.F. and Keller, J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 28 566 (1976).Google Scholar
10. Volkl, J. & Alefeld, G., Chap. 12 in Hydrogen in Metals I edited by Alefeld, G. & Volkl, J., Springer-Verlag Berlin 1978.Google Scholar