Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-qxsvm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-11T22:36:28.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diffusion of Carbon Dioxide Through Upper Layers of Yucca Mountain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Ajeet Singh ,
Gary Tatterson ,
Franklin G. King  and
Tevfik Bardakci
Ajeet Singh
Affiliation:
North Carolina A&T State University, Department of Chemical Engineering Greensboro, N.C. 27411
Gary Tatterson
Affiliation:
North Carolina A&T State University, Department of Chemical Engineering Greensboro, N.C. 27411
Franklin G. King
Affiliation:
North Carolina A&T State University, Department of Chemical Engineering Greensboro, N.C. 27411
Tevfik Bardakci*
Affiliation:
Akdeniz University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences 07070 Antalya - TURKEY
*
1To whom correspondence should be addressed
Get access

Abstract

The effective diffusivities of carbon dioxide through Tiva Canyon tuff and the lower lithophysal zone of the Topopah Spring tuff (outcrop sample of the layer above the proposed nuclear repository site layer) were determined using a steady-state method (counter diffusion). The diffusivity of carbon dioxide through the Tiva Canyon and lithophysal zone tuffs increased with temperature and decreased with percent saturation. The following correlation was obtained to estimate the effective diffusivity of carbon dioxide through the Tiva Canyon tuff as a function temperature and percent saturation.

De = 1.2168×10−2 − 3.7713×10−5 T + 9.9510×10−8 T2 − 4.2220×10−5 × (Percent Saturation)

where De is in cm2/sec and T in K. These units hold for all other correlations in this paper.

The effective diffusivity of carbon dioxide through the lower lithophysal zone of the Topopah Spring tuff (layer right above the proposed repository site) also increased with temperature and decreased with percent saturation. For this layer, the following correlation was obtained to estimate the effective diffusivity of carbon dioxide as a function temperature and percent saturation.

De = − 1.119×10−3 + 1.2512×10−5 T + 1.8288×10−9 T2 × 2.0725×10−5 × (Percent Saturation)

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 257: Symposium – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XV , 1991 , 617
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. “Annotated Outline for Site Characterization Plans (OGR/B- 5),” U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Report. DOE/RW-0142, 33, (April 1987).Google Scholar
2. Van Konynenburg, R.A., Smith, C.F., Culman, H.W., and Otto, C.H. Jr., “Behavior of 14C in Waste Packages for Spent Fuel in a Repository Tuff,” in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management. VIII. Jantzen, C.M., Stone, J.A., Ewing, R.C., eds., Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA., (1985).Google Scholar
3. Thomas, T.R., and Brown, R.A., in Proc. of the 18th D.O.E. Nuclear and Air Cleaning Conference, Baltimore, MD, August 12-16, 1984, ed. First, M.W., CONF-840806 (U.S. Dept of Energy, Washington, D.C.) 1, 998 (1985).Google Scholar
4. Bish, D.L., and Vaniman, D. T., “Mineralogical Summary of Yucca Mountain,” Los Alamos, Natl. Lab. Report LA-10543-Ms, (1985).Google Scholar
5. Craig, R.W., Reed, R. L., and Spengler, R. W., “Geohydrologic Data for Test Well USW H-6 Yucca Mountain Area, Nye County, Nevada, “U.S. Geological Survey Report, USGS-FOR-84-856, (1984).Google Scholar
6. Daily, W., Lin, W., and Bushchek, T., “Hydrological Properties of Topopah Spring Tuff:Laboratory Measurements,” Journal of Geophysical Research, 92, 7854 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Bardakci, T., King, F.G., and Sein, M., “Temperature and Saturation Effects on Diffusion of Carbon Dioxide through Tuff,” AIChE J, 36, 469 (1990).Google Scholar
8. Bardakci, T., King, F.G., Sein, M. “Effective Diffusivity of Carbon Dioxide And Iodine Through “G” Tunnel Tuff,” Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIII, Oversby, V., ed. Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA., 751 (1990).Google Scholar
9. Singh, A., MS Thesis, Chemical Engineering Department, North Carolina A&T State University, August, 1991.Google Scholar
10. Nimick, F. B. and Schwartz, B. M., “Bulk, Thermal and Mechanical Properties of the Paintbrush Tuff, Yucca Mountain, Nevada,” Sandia Report Number SAND85-0762.UC-70, (1987). Smith, J.M., Chemical Engineering Kinetics, third ed., McGraw Hill Book Co., New York, (1983).Google Scholar
11. Wicke, E., and Kallenbach, R., “Counter Diffusion Through Porous Pellet,” Kolloid Z.. 97, 135 (1941).Google Scholar
12. Bardakci, T., and Gasner, L.L., “Experimental Studies Using a Single Pellet High Temperature Diffusion Cell Reactor.” Thermochimica Acta, 45, 233 (1981).Google Scholar
13. Evans, R.B., Watson, G.M, and Mason, E.A., “Gaseous Diffusion in Porous Media at Uniform Pressure,” J. of Chem. Phys.,35, 2076 (1961).Google Scholar