Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T18:07:48.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Determination of Optical Properties of Fluorocarbon Polymer Thin Films by a Variable Angle Spectroscopic Ellipsometry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Kang-Kuk Lee
Affiliation:
Dept of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, Hanyang University, Ansan, 425 – 791, Korea
Jin-Goo Park
Affiliation:
Dept of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, Hanyang University, Ansan, 425 – 791, Korea
Hyung-Jae Shin
Affiliation:
Core Technology Research Center, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Suwon, 442–742, Korea
Get access

Abstract

Optical properties of vapor phase (VP) deposited and spin-coated fluorocarbon (FC) thin films on silicon substrates, such as refractive index, extinction coefficient and film thickness were characterized by a variable angle spectroscopic ellipsometry (VASE) in the range of 300–800 nm. A Lorentz model allows us to simulate the optical constants of the FC films with a minimum number of parameters while maintaining Kramers-Kronig (KK) consistency between the real and imaginary parts of the optical constants. FC films are nearly transparent over the visible spectrum, so it is possible to assume k (extinction coefficient) = 0 over part of the visible spectrum in a Cauchy model. To accurately simulate the obtained ellipsometric spectra, we performed a regression analysis in two steps assuming a three-phase and a four-phase model. The regression analysis was performed using the three-phase model and a best-fit mean-squared error (MSE) value of 1.717 (VP deposited FC film, Lorentz model) was obtained. However, the four-phase model was used to improve the best-fit result of 0.531 (VP deposited FC film, Lorentz model). The surface roughness layer was assumed to be a mixture of FC films and voids under the Bruggeman effective medium approximation (EMA). We found that the best-fit MSE was reduced when surface roughness was included.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Howe, R. T., Boser, B. E., and Pisano, A. P., J.Sensor and Actuators A 56, 167(1996).Google Scholar
2. Takahara, A., in Modern Approaches to Wettability Theory and Applications, edited by Schrader, M. E. and Loeb, G. I. (Plenum Press, New York, 1992), pp. 179212; M. E. Schrader, pp. 53–71.Google Scholar
3. Maboudian, R. and Howe, R. T., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B 15 (1), 1 (1997).Google Scholar
4. Jansen, H. V., Gardeniers, J. G. E., Elders, J.. Tilmans, H. A. C., and Elwenspoek, M., J. Sensor and Actuators A, 41–42, 136 (1994).Google Scholar
5. Technical Notes on Fluorad Fluorochemical Coating FC-722, 3M, MN, U.S.A, 1982.Google Scholar
6. Park, J. G., Kwon, M. J., Lee, S. H., Lee, K. K., Kim, Y. K., and Shin, H. J., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., B 37 (1), 7058(1998).Google Scholar
7. H. Rafla-Yuan, Hichwa, B. P., and Allen, T. H., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A 16 (5), 3119 (1998).Google Scholar
8. Yang, T., Goto, S., Kawata, M., Uchida, K., Niwa, A., and Gotoh, J., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., A 37 (2), L 1105 (1998).Google Scholar
9. Mo, Y. G., Dillon, R. O., and Snyder, P. G., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A 17 (1), 170 (1999).Google Scholar
10. Synowicki, R. A., Thin Solid Films, 313–314, 394 (1998).Google Scholar
11. Aspnes, D. E., in Handbook of Optical constants of Solids, edited by Palik, E. D. (Academic Press, New York, 1985), pp. 765.Google Scholar
12. Fowles, G. R., Introduction to Modern Optics, (Dover Publications, New York, 1968), pp. 160168.Google Scholar
13. Balkanski, M., in Handbook on Semiconductors, edited by Moss, T. S., (North-Holland Publishing Company, New York, 1980), pp. 507.Google Scholar
14. Pankove, J. L., Optical Processes in Semiconductors, (Dover Publications, New York, 1971), pp. 9495.Google Scholar