Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T19:21:04.883Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Derivation of Many-Body Potentials for Examining Defect Behavior in Bcc Niobium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

James M. Eridon
Affiliation:
Condensed Matter and Radiation Sciences Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C. 20375
Satish Rao
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061
Get access

Abstract

Many-body potentials, in either the Embedded Atom or Finnis-Sinclair form, have gained wide popularity recently. The major difficulty in implementing the method concerns the derivation of suitable forms for the pair potential, electron density, and embedding, function which reproduce a range of empirically observable parameters such as elastic constants, defect formation energies, and defect Green's functions. This is a particularly difficult problem for niobium, which shows a variety of anomalous features in its phonon dispersion. Embedding functions which match only elastic constants may do a poor job of reproducing short wavelength behavior, and hence provide poor defect modeling. A straightforward method of deriving embedding functions for homonuclear BCC and

FCC metals will be presented which provides excellent agreement with experimental phonon dispersion curves and elastic constants, as well as Griineisen coefficients, vacancy formation energies, lattice constants and heats of sublimation. The results of the application of a set of many-body potentials derived in this fashion to nitrogen irradiated niobium will be presented.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Finnis, M.W. and Sinclair, J.E., Phil. Mag. A 50, 45 (1984).Google Scholar
2. Ackland, G.J. Thetford, R., Phil Mag. A 56, 15 (1987).Google Scholar
3. Rebonato, R., Welch, D.O., Hatcher, R.D., Bilello, J.C., Phil. Mag. A 55, 655 (1987).Google Scholar
4. Rebonato, R. and Broughton, J.Q., Phil. Mag. Lett. 55, 225 (1987).Google Scholar
5. Marchese, M., Jaucucci, G., Flynn, C.P., Phil. Mag. Lett. 57, 25 (1988).Google Scholar
6. Daw, M.S. and Baskes, M.I., Phys. Rev. B 29, 6443 (1984).Google Scholar
7. Eridon, J.M. and Rao, S., to be published in Phil. Mag. Lett. (1) (1989).Google Scholar
8. Squires, G.L., Ark. Fys. 25, 21 (1963).Google Scholar
9. Nakagawa, Y., and Woods, A.D.B., in Lattice Dynamics, edited by Wallis, R.F. (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1965) p. 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Sharp, R.I., J. Phys. C ( Solid St. Phys.) 2, 421 (1969).Google Scholar
11. Eridon, J.M., presented at the 1988 World Materials Congress, Chicago, Illinois, 1988, to be published in Atomistic Modeling: Beyond Pair Potentials.Google Scholar
12. DeLorenzi, G. and Jacucci, G., Phys. Rev. B 33, 1993 (1986).Google Scholar
13. Rao, S. and Houska, C.R., presented at the 1988 Fall MRS Meeting, Boston, MA, 1988.Google Scholar
14. Foiles, S.M., Baskes, M.I., Daw, M.S., (private communication).Google Scholar
15. Fletcher, R. and Reeves, C.M., The Computer Journal 7, 149 (1964).Google Scholar
16. Sutton, A.P., submitted to Philosophical Magazine A, September, 1988.Google Scholar