Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:24:50.696Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Deformation Processes during Indentation of Mesoporous Silica Thin Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

M. Klotz ,
A. Perriot  and
E. Barthel
M. Klotz
Affiliation:
Unité Mixte CNRS/Saint-Gobain “Surface du Verre et Interface”, UMR 125, Saint-Gobain, Recherche, F-93303, Aubervilliers, Cedex, France. etienne.barthel@saint-gobain.com
A. Perriot
Affiliation:
Unité Mixte CNRS/Saint-Gobain “Surface du Verre et Interface”, UMR 125, Saint-Gobain, Recherche, F-93303, Aubervilliers, Cedex, France. etienne.barthel@saint-gobain.com
E. Barthel
Affiliation:
Unité Mixte CNRS/Saint-Gobain “Surface du Verre et Interface”, UMR 125, Saint-Gobain, Recherche, F-93303, Aubervilliers, Cedex, France. etienne.barthel@saint-gobain.com
Get access

Abstract

Nanoindentation was used to probe the mechanical response of mesoporous silica films as a function of processing treatment. A contrasted behaviour appears between low temperature processed films which retain the templating agent and are thus little compressible, and high temperature processed films, which are more condensed and also exhibit high porosity. We suggest that the behaviour of the former is dominated by shear flow, at least above a given threshold, while the latter are characterized by a yield strength in compression as is commonly found in porous materials. The response to indentation allows fast qualitative comparison of mechanical responses: in the present work, we show that a fast UV-O3 treatment results in mechanical properties which are undistinguishable from a much more cumbersome high temperature heat treatment.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 791: Symposium Q – Mechanical Properties of Nanostructured Materials and Nanocomposites , 2003 , Q6.2
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Pevzner, S., Regev, O. and Yerushalmi-Rozen, R., Current Opinion in Colloid and Interface Science 4, 420 (2000).Google Scholar
2. Brinker, C. J., Lu, Y., Seelinger, A. and Fan, H., Adv. Mat. 11, 579 (1999).Google Scholar
3. Craven, E., Besson, S., Klotz, M., Gacoin, T., Boilot, J.P. et Barthel, E., Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis, 146, 534 (2003).Google Scholar
4. Vella, J. B., Adhihetty, I.S., Junker, K. and Volinsky, A.A., Int. J. Fract., 119/120, 487 (2003).Google Scholar
5. Besson, S., Gacoin, T., Jacquiod, C., Ricolleau, C., Babonneau, D. and Boilot, J. P., J. Mater. Chem., 10, 1331 (2000).Google Scholar
6. Besson, S., Ricolleau, C., Gacoin, T., Jacquiod, C. and Boilot, J. P., J. Phys. Chem. B, 104, 12095 (2000).Google Scholar
7. Oliver, W. C. and Pharr, G. M., J. Mat. Res. 7, 1564 (1992).Google Scholar
8. Wilsea, M., Johnson, K. L. and Ashby, M. F., Int. J. mech. Sci., 17, 457 (1975).Google Scholar
9. Leite, M. H. and Ferland, F., Engineering Geology 59, 267 (2001).Google Scholar