Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T22:38:30.527Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Defect States and Structural Disorder in a-Si.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

B. N. Davidson
Affiliation:
Departments of Physics and Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695–8202
G. Lucovsky
Affiliation:
Departments of Physics and Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695–8202
J. Bernholc
Affiliation:
Departments of Physics and Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695–8202
Get access

Abstract

We have examined the distribution of the neutral dangling bond defect states, T30, as a function of the local disorder. T30 defects in a-Si play an important role in many of the current models of the metastable photoconductivity. To understand the relationship between the T30 defect and its bonding environment, the Local Density of States (LDOS) for under-coordinated Si atoms in disordered environments are calculated using the cluster-Bethe lattice method, CBLM. Our Hamiltonian employs the tight-binding parameters of an sp3 orbital basis containing both 1st and 2nd nearest-neighbor interaction terms fit to c-Si band structure. Averaged LDOS of atoms with various bond angle distortions are calculated in order to demonstrate the relationship between the standard deviation in bond angle and the width of the defect states. The CBLM is also used to determine the extent of the valence band tails as a function of the standard deviation in bond angle. In addition, the LDOS of clusters with 2 dangling bonds are examined to determine the degree that their energy levels split due to their interaction with each other.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Staebler, D. L. and Wronski, C. R., J. Appl. Phys. 51, 3262 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Dersch, H., Stuke, J. and Beichler, J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 31, 292 (1977)/Google Scholar
3. Smith, Z.E. and Wagner, S., Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 688 (1987).Google Scholar
4. Heine, V., in Solid State Physics, edited by Ehrenreich, H., Seitz, F. and Turnbull, D. (Academic, New York, 1980), Vol. 35, pp. 118119.Google Scholar
5. Davidson, B. N., Lucovsky, G. and Bernholc, J., MRS Symp. Proc. 219, 581 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Joannoupoulos, J. D., Phys. Rev. B16, 2764 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Fedders, P. A. and Carlsson, A. E., Phys. Rev. B39, 1134 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Winer, K., Phys. Rev. B41, 12150 (1990).Google Scholar
9. Slater, J. C. and Koster, G. F., Phys. Rev. 94, 1498 (1954).Google Scholar
10. Chelikowski, J.R. and Cohen, M.L., Phys. Rev. B10, 5095 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Allan, D.C., Joannopoulos, J.D. and Pollard, W.B., Phys. Rev. B25, 1065 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Davidson, B. N., Lucovsky, G. and Bernholc, J., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 137&138, 307 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Pandey, K. C. and Phillips, J. C., Phys. Rev. B13, 750 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Biegelsen, D. K. and Stutzmann, M., Phys. Rev. B33, 3006 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar