Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T07:48:50.130Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Defect Growth Interruption Phenomena Related to Impurity Atoms in Growing Multilayer Si-Si1−x Gex Systems Deposited by APCVD

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

I. Babanskaya
Affiliation:
Institute of Semiconductor Physics, Frankfurt (Oder), Germany
G. Lippert
Affiliation:
Institute of Semiconductor Physics, Frankfurt (Oder), Germany
D. KrÜger
Affiliation:
Institute of Semiconductor Physics, Frankfurt (Oder), Germany
M. Methfessel
Affiliation:
Institute of Semiconductor Physics, Frankfurt (Oder), Germany
G. Morgenstern
Affiliation:
Institute of Semiconductor Physics, Frankfurt (Oder), Germany
T. Morgenstern
Affiliation:
Institute of Semiconductor Physics, Frankfurt (Oder), Germany
Get access

Abstract

The present paper examines conditions which can lead to generation or blocking of structural defects as observed in the deposition of the Si-Si1−x Gex heterostructures prepared by conventional AP CVD. The lowering of the epitaxial temperature can lead to a breakdown of the epitaxial growth and to a generation of defects such as dendritically grown polycrystalline inclusions. Their generation depends on the moisture and oxygen content in the gas mixture. Fast cooling during growth of the underlying buffer layer leads to defect growth interruption and is attributed to the influence of hydrogen adsorption / desorption. A similar defect growth blocking has been found by addition of diborane to the gas mixture during CVD deposition.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kühne, H. and Morgenstern, Th., Cryst. Res. Technol. 27, 773 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Kühne, H., J. Cryst. Growth, 125, 291 (1992).Google Scholar
3. Sedgwick, T. O., and Agnello, P. D., J. Vac. Sci. Techn. A 10, 1913 (1992).Google Scholar
4. Meyerson, B. S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 58, 1286 (1991).Google Scholar
5. Morgenstern, Th., Babanskaya, I., Morgenstern, G., Schmalz, K., Gaworzewski, P., Zaumseil, P., Krüiger, D., Tittelbach-Helmrich, K., in Proc. SPIE Europto, International Symposium on Physical Concepts and Materials for Novel Optoelectronic Device Applications 11, May 1993, Trieste, 1985 -12Google Scholar
6. Kroger, D., Morgenstern, Th., Kurps, R., Bugiel, E., Quick, Ch., and Kühne, H., Solid state phenomena, 32–33, 197 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Greve, D.W., Mat. Sci. and Engin. B18, 22 (1993).Google Scholar
8. Gates, S.M., Greenlief, C.M., and Beach, D.B., J. Chem. Phys, 93, 7493 (1990).Google Scholar
9. Liehr, M., Greenfief, C.M., Offenberg, M., and Kasi, S.R., J. Vac. Sci. Techn. A 8, 2960 (1990).Google Scholar
10. Sinniah, K., Sherman, M.G., Lewis, L.B., Weinberg, W.H., Yates, G.T., and Janda, K.C., J. Chem. Phys, 92, 5700 (1990).Google Scholar
11. Gates, S.M., Greenlief, C.M., Beach, D.B., and Kunz, R.R., Chem. Phys. Lett, 154, 505 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Wise, M.L., Koehler, B.G., Gupta, R., Coon, P.A., and George, S.M., Surf. Sci, 258, 166 (1991).Google Scholar