Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T01:42:16.557Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Deep Levels Associated with Oxygen Precipitation in CZ Silicon and Correlation with Minority Carrier Lifetimes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

S. S. Chan
Affiliation:
Motorola Semiconductor Research and Development Laboratories, Phoenix, AZ 85008
C. J. Varker
Affiliation:
Motorola Semiconductor Research and Development Laboratories, Phoenix, AZ 85008
J. D. Whitfield
Affiliation:
Motorola Semiconductor Research and Development Laboratories, Phoenix, AZ 85008
R. W. Carpenter
Affiliation:
Arizona State University, Center of Solid State Science, Tempe, AZ 85287
Get access

Abstract

A dominant electron trap in boron-doped CZ silicon at Ec −0.41 ± 0.02 eV with a electron capture cross section >10−14 cm2 has been observed with DLTS in 2-step annealed (16 hrs at 800°C + 16 hrs at 1050°C) seed end wafers where oxygen precipitation is pronounced. A strong correlation between the generation lifetime τg (as calculated from junction reverse generation currents) and the density of this trap is also observed. Electron microscopy showed the dominant precipitates to be {100} plate type containing only Si and 0, with dislocations and punched-out loops in close proximity. Wafers from the center- or tang-sections of the ingot or those given a 1-step anneal (conditions which result in much less oxygen precipitation) contain a low density (<1.2 × 1012 cm−3) of a hole trap at Ev +0.25 eV not correlated with Tg. These wafers contain precipitates with a different morphology with much rower or minimal dislocation densities. Possible origins of the lifetime controlling electron trap is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Oxygen in Silicon,” Chapter 3 of Semiconductor Silicon 1981, edited by Huff, H. R., Kriegler, R. J. and Takeishi, Y. (Electrochemical Society, Pennington, NJ, 1981), pp. 187328.Google Scholar
2. Ohtaki, R., Matsushita, Y. and Tajima, M., in Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Defects in Semiconductors 1984, edited by Kimerling, L. C. and Parsey, J. M. Jr, (The Metallurgical Society of the AIME, NY, 1985) p. 571.Google Scholar
3. Forbes, L., Whitwer, F. D. and Peng, J. D., presented at the Material Research Society Nov. 1984 Meeting, Symposium C, to be published.Google Scholar
4. Kirchner, P. D., Schaff, W. J., Maracas, G. N., Eastman, L. F., Chappell, T. I. and Ransom, C. M., J. Appl. Phys. 52, 6462 (1981).Google Scholar
5. Miller, G. L., Lang, D. V. and Kimerling, L. C., Ann. Rev. Mater. Sci, 7, 377 (1977).Google Scholar
6. Sze, S. M., Physics of Semiconductor Devices, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1981), p. 90.Google Scholar
7. Varker, C. J., Wilson, S., Chan, S. S., Whitfield, J. D., and Krause, S. J., presented at the Material Research Society Spring 1985 Meeting, Symposium A, to be published.Google Scholar
8. Kimerling, L. C. and Patel, J. R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 34, 73 (1979).Google Scholar
9. Carpenter, R. W., Chan, I., Tsai, H. L., Varker, C. J. and Demer, L. J., in Defects in Semiconductors II, Proceedings of the Material Research Society Vol. 14, edited by Mahajan, S. and Corbett, J. (North-Holland, NY, 1983), p. 195.Google Scholar
10. Skiff, W. M., Carpenter, R. W. and Lin, S. H., in Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Electron Microscopy Society of America, edited by Bailey, G. W., (San Francisco Press, San Francisco, 1984), p. 560.Google Scholar
11. Tsai, H. L. and Carpenter, R. W., in Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Electron Microscopy Society of America, edited by Bailey, G. W. (San Francisco Press, San Francisco, 1983), p. 152.Google Scholar
12. Shimura, F., J. Crystal Growth 54, 588 (1981).Google Scholar